Toyota Sienna Complaints
9,048 consumer complaints on file.
- #10163419July 25, 2006TIRES:TREAD/BELT
CONSISTENTLY POOR TREAD LIFE ON RUN-FLAT TIRES FOR TOYOTA SIENNA. *NM
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10163358July 24, 2006POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
AS WE EXITED THE DEALERSHIP AFTER PURCHASING THE 2005 TOYOTA SIENNA VAN, THE TRANSMISSION SEEMED TO SLIP AS IT DOWNSHIFTED INTO A SLOW TURN. THIS HAPPENED SO MANY TIMES WITH VARIOUS DRIVERS THAT WE CONTACTED THE DEALER. SOME FIVE TRIPS AND WEEKS WITHOUT OUR VEHICLE, THE DEALER COULDN'T FIX IT. THEY ALSO EXPERIENCED THE PROBLEM AND WOULD CONTACT THE TOYOTA REP. MORE VISITS AND CALLS AND NO REPAIR. THE DEALER SAID THE TRANSMISSION WAS GETTING USED TO THE PRIMARY DRIVER. DEALER SEEMED TO DOUBT OUR CREDIBILITY, BUT HAS AGREED TO EITHER FIX IT OR "CONVINCE US THAT THIS IS THE WAY A 2005 SIENNA VAN DRIVES." AFTER READING THE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS JUST LIKE OURS, I DOUBT THAT TOYOTA CAN FIX THIS. COMPUTER WAS REPROGRAMMED AND FLUID CHANGED--MADE IT WORSE. WE GIVE UP. WE NOTE THAT THE 2006 SIENNA HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY COMPLAINTS LIKE THIS. *NM
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10163106July 21, 2006LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE'S SLIDING SIDE DOOR REMAINED LATCHED AND ONCE THE DOOR BECOMES LATCHED IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO REOPEN. THE VEHICLE WAS MANUFACTURED WITH A REMOTE LOCKING DEVICE. THE DEALER DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE'S PUSH BUTTON NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT EXPRESSED THAT THE PROBLEM COULD BE ELECTRICAL FAILURE. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN FIXED DUE TO COST.*AK
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162717July 18, 2006EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT BOTH OF THE VEHICLE'S HEADLIGHTS ARE AIMED TOWARDS THE GROUND. THE VEHICLE WAS MODIFIED BY A MOBILITY INDUSTRY IN 01/06 TO ACCOMMODATE DISABLED PASSENGERS. THE VEHICLE'S INDEPENDENT REAR SUSPENSION WAS REPLACED WITH A SOLID AXLE WHICH RAISED THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE 2 INCHES CAUSING THE HEADLIGHTS TO BE AIMED 50FT AHEAD. THE MOBILITY INDUSTRY WAS NOTIFIED ABOUT THE DEFECT ON THE 07/13/06 AND DETERMINED THAT NOTHING COULD BE DONE. THE VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO DETERMINED THAT NOTHING COULD BE DONE.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162602July 17, 2006STEERING
2004 TOYOTA SIENNA WITH 39,000 MILES. STEERING SHAFT ASSEMBLY FAILED - NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO MANEUVER CAR. FAILURE OCCURRED SUDDENLY, AS IF POWER STEERING SYSTEM FAILED. FAILURE BLAMED ON RUBBER BOOT. CORRECTIVE ACTION: STEERING SHAFT ASSEMBLY REPLACED AT CONSUMER COST. OLD PART IS AVAILABLE FOR GOVERNMENT VIEWING. SUDDEN FAILURE COULD HAVE CAUSED LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL AND ACCIDENT AT HIGH SPEEDS. TOYOTA REFUSED TO COVER REPAIR DUE TO MY NOT HAVING 30,000 MILES SERVICE PERFORMED AT LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP! *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162687July 17, 2006FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS
2004 SIENNA - MANUFACTURED 03? JULY 14TH DROVE FROM CA TO AZ - 5 KIDS AND MY BROTHER SAT. AFTER DRIVING ~ 2 HOURS STOPPED FOR GAS. FILLED TANK. A FEW MINUTES LATER, THE CAR SUDDENLY LOST POWER & PROCEEDED TO SLOW DOWN VERY QUICKLY. WE QUICKLY PULLED TO THE SIDE. HE OPENED THE HOOD, LOOKED & CRAWLED UNDER CAR. QUICKLY CRAWLED BACK WITH PARTS OF HIS T-SHIRT, HIS FACE AND ONE ARM COVERED WITH GAS. HE SAID FUEL LINE WAS LOOSE AND LINE WAS CLOSE TO EXHAUST, DANGER OF FIRE OR POSSIBLE EXPLOSION. HAD SOME TOOLS IN THE CAR. MY DESCRIPTION OF WHAT HE DID --> TRIED TO FORCE THE CONNECTION BACK TOGETHER. SERVICE PERSON AT DEALERSHIP HAD NO EXPLANATION WHY THE FUEL LINE WOULD HAVE COME OFF. THERE WERE NO ACCIDENTS/ ROCKS/ OR UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ONLY FACTS THAT I KNOW OF THAT MAY HAVE PLAYED A ROLE IS - WE HAD BEEN DRIVING IN ~110 WEATHER AND THEN FILLED THE TANK - PRESSURE BUILD FORCED THE CONNECTION LOOSE ? HAD MY BROTHER NOT BEEN THERE, I WOULD HAVE TRIED TO START THE CAR - WITH THE VERY HOT EXHAUST LINE / ? POSSIBLE MAJOR FIRE OR EXPLOSION. REPLACING AN APPARENTLY OK FUEL LINE WITH NEW OF THE SAME MAKE & MODEL CONCERNS ME. TOYOTA SHOULD INVESTIGATE THE ROOT CAUSE AND FIND OUT IF PART WAS FAULTY. THIS PROBLEM CAN COME UP AGAIN AT ANY TIME ANYWHERE ... CAN YOU RECOMMEND A COURSE OF ACTION. DO YOU HAVE ANY POWER OVER TOYOTA SERVICE - CAN THEY FOR EXAMPLE USE ADDITIONAL CLAMPS ETC ... THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE - WE COULD HAVE BEEN DEAD. THIS IS NOT SIMILAR TO A RADIATOR CAP WHERE THE FAULTY PART CAN CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE CAR ... THIS CAN ACTUALLY KILL PEOPLE WITHOUT WARNING. I HAVE ASKED THE SERVICE PERSON TO KEEP THE OLD PART - CAN YOU REQUEST THAT TOYOTA OR OTHER UNBIASED AGENCIES INVESTIGATE THE CAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM. THERE ARE SEVERAL REFERENCES ON INTERNET ABOUT SIENNA DAMAGED OR FAULTY FUEL TANK .. THE SITES ARE BLOCKED SO I CAN NOT READ DETAILS. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162380July 14, 2006VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE PRESENTED A STRESS CRACK TO THE WINDSHIELD WHILE PARKED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERS WHO DETERMINED THAT VEHICLE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND THAT THE CRACK TO THE WINDSHIELD WAS NOT PART OF A DEFECT. THE MANUFACTURER WAS ALSO CONTACTED AND REFUSED INSPECTION OF THE VEHICLE. THE WINDSHIELD HAD NOT BEEN REPLACED.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162179July 12, 2006LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH
POWER SLIDING DOOR FAILED TO RETRACT. ONCE WHEN MY WIFE WAS LEANING IN THE VAN TO GET SOMETHING, I ACCIDENTALLY PUSHED THE BUTTON ON MY KEY CHAIN THAT CLOSES THE DOOR. IT JAMMED HER LEG. THE DOOR DIDN'T REOPEN UNTIL I PUSHED THE BUTTON. THIS HAPPENED A SECOND TIME WHEN MY WIFE WAS AGAIN GETTING SOMETHING OUT OF THE BACK SEAT WHEN MY GRANDDAUGHTER PUSHED THE BUTTON ON THE INSIDE OF THE CAR TO CLOSE IT. MY WIFE SAID SHE EVEN TRIED TO USE HER BODY WEIGHT TO STOP THE DOOR OR TO MAKE IT OPEN BACK UP, BUT IT DIDN'T. FORTUNATELY SHE WAS ABLE TO REACH THE BUTTON. THE THIRD TIME THIS HAPPENED, MY GRANDSON WAS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE VAN AND PUT HIS FINGERS IN THE WAY AS THE DOOR WAS CLOSING. IT TOTALLY CLOSED ON HIS FINGERS. THEY WERE SMASHED AND BRUISED. NO SERIOUS INJURIES OCCURRED. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 2
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162063July 11, 2006EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
HEADLIGHT DESIGN ALLOWS MOISTURE AND CONDENSATION INSIDE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY CAUSING VARIABLE AND DECREASED LIGHTING EFFECTIVENESS. ENTIRE INSIDE OF HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY CAN BE COATED WITH MOISTURE. MOISTURE CLEARS AND RECURRED DEPENDING ON WEATHER CONDITIONS. TOYOTA DEALER DECLINED TO FIX. *NM
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161884July 8, 2006STRUCTURE:BODY:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE
AFTER PICKING UP OUR VEHICLE FROM NAPERVILLE TOYOTA SERVICE ON JUNE 20TH, 2006, WHERE IT WAS BROUGHT IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND CHECK-UP, IT WAS DISCOVERED THE REAR HATCH STRUTS HAD FAILED OVERNIGHT, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AND WITHOUT WARNING. THIS FAILURE CAUSED THE REAR DOOR TO OPEN AS USUAL BUT SUBSEQUENTLY SLAM DOWN ON THE VEHICLE OWNER WITH FULL FORCE ONTO THEIR HEAD. ALTHOUGH THE INJURY SUSTAINED WAS MINOR, THE REAR DOOR WAS UNABLE TO OPERATED AUTOMATICALLY AND HAD TO BE PHYSICALLY HELD OPEN TO LOAD OR UNLOAD ANY CARGO IN THE BACK. BOTH THE DEALERSHIP AND THE NATIONAL TOYOTA CONSUMER SERVICE HOTLINE WERE INFORMED OF THE SAFETY ISSUE. THE REPAIRS TO THE VEHICLE WERE QUOTED AT $430.00 BECAUSE THE WARRANTY WAS OVER BY ONLY 431 MILES. ( CASE # 200607080129). THERE WAS AN OFFER OF A 50 DOLLAR LABOR DISCOUNT UPON COMPLAINT. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 1
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161896July 8, 2006STRUCTURE:BODY:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE:SUPPORT DEVICE/STRUT
LIFTGATE SUPPORT CYLINDER IS LEAKING, WON'T SUPPORT THE LIFTGATE. FELL ON MY HEAD THE FIRST TIME BEFORE I KNEW ABOUT THE PROBLEM. HAPPENED 1000 MILES OUT OF WARRANTY AND THE DEALERSHIP WOULDN'T HELP ME OUT. THE PART IS VERY EXPENSIVE FOR WHAT IT IS. $180.00 FROM THE DEALERSHIP. I ORDERED MINE ON THE INTERNET FOR $125.00. STILL WAITING FOR IT TO COME. *NM
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161849July 7, 2006ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH
POWER DOOR LOCKS HAVE STARTED TO FAIL ON MY 1999 SIENNA LE. THE DRIVER'S DOOR SEEMS TO BE THE PROBLEMATIC PART OF THE SYSTEM. THE OTHER DOORS SEEM TO WANT TO RESPOND BUT DRIVER DOOR MAKES A 'CLICK, CLICK, CLICK' SOUND AND DOESN'T RESPOND. KEY USUALLY WORKS TO LOCK AND UNLOCK BUT NOT CONSISTENTLY. DANGEROUS SINCE PEOPLE COULD BE TRAPPED IN VEHICLE DURING AN ACCIDENT, ETC AND OTHER POSSIBLY DANGEROUS SCENARIOS COULD OCCUR. REPORTING THIS SINCE IT MOST LIKELY HAS HAPPENED TO OTHERS AND WANTED IT ON RECORD. DRIVER AND OTHERS COULD BE TRAPPED INSIDE WHICH IS DANGEROUS. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161627July 6, 2006VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS
I HAVE REPLACED BOTH FRONT DOOR WINDOW MOTORS. AFTER RESEARCHING THE PROBLEM I HAVE DISCOVERED THE MOTOR CONTAINS A FAULTY LOAD SENSOR. IT IS NOT THE ACTUAL MOTOR, BUT THE LOAD SENSOR THAT IS FAILING. THE SENOR IS LOCATED INTERNALLY IN THE MOTOR. TOYOTA KNOWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM, BUT IS NOT TAKING OWNERSHIP. NOW ONE OF MY TWO NEW MOTORS IS STARTING TO SHOWS SIGNS OF ITS SENSOR FAILING. TOYOTA NEEDS TO COVER THE COST OR MAKE THE SENSOR REPLACEMENT AVAILABLE, OTHERWISE IT IS $270 FOR THE COST OF THE REPLACEMENT MOTOR PLUS LABOR. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161637July 6, 2006VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER
THE RIGHT WINDSHIELD WIPER LEAVES MUCH WATER DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF ME BEFORE THE LEFT WIPER REMOVES IT. EVERY WIPE, WHILE THE WATER IS IN MY LINE OF SIGHT, I STRUGGLE TO SEE THE ROAD. THIS IS DEFINITELY A HAZARD TO MY FAMILY'S SAFETY, AND SHOULD BE EASILY REPAIRED WITH A SIMPLE IMPROVEMENT IN THE DESIGN OF THE WIPER CYCLE. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161674July 6, 2006SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR
2004 TOYOTA SIENNA, LEFT OUTSIDE IN LONG TERM PARKING FOR THREE WEEKS, DURING THAT TIME IT RAINED A LOT. UPON RETURN AND BACKING OUT OF PARKING SPOT, A POPPING SOUND WAS HEARD. SINCE THEN EVERY TIME THE BRAKE IS DEPRESSED A THUMPING NOISE CAN BE HEARD FROM THE TIRE. INSPECTION OF THE TIRE DIDN'T REVEAL ANYTHING STUCK IN THEM THAT WOULD CAUSE THE NOISE. AFTER BRINGING IT TO THE DEALER FOR SERVICING, THE TECHNICIAN EXPLAINED THAT RUST BUILD ON THE ROTOR ACTUALLY FUSED TO THE BRAKE PAD THUS CAUSING THE POPPING NOISE. THE THUMPING NOISE WHEN THE BRAKE IS APPLIED IS CAUSED BY THE BRAKE PAD RUBBING AGAINST THE RUST ON THE ROTOR. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. HAS REFUSED AND SO HAS THE DEALER TO REPLACE THE ROTOR SINCE THEY SAY IT IS A WEAR AND TEAR ITEM AND HAS EXCEEDED THE WARRANTY PERIOD SO I WILL HAVE TO COME UP WITH THE MONEY TO REPLACE THEM. THERE SHOULD NOT BE THAT MUCH RUST ON ANY PART OF AN 04 SIENNA THAT IT WOULD FUSE TO ANOTHER PART OF THE VEHICLE. THIS IS A DEFECT AND SHOULD BE HANDLED BY THE MANUFACTURER. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10162628July 5, 2006TIRES
2004 TOYOTA SIENNA TIRES BLEW OUT. *KB ***NAR*** THE VEHICLE CAME EQUIPPED WITH RUN FLAT TIRES AND HAD SUFFERED 2 BLOWN OUT TIRES WITHIN THE LAST 6 MONTHS. THE VEHICLE DID NOT COME WITH A SPARE TIRE. THE CONSUMER FOUND IT WAS DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN A REPLACEMENT TIRE. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT NEITHER BRIDGESTONE NOR TOYOTA CARRY SPARES FOR THAT TYPE OF TIRE. THE CONSUMER WAS ALSO TOLD THAT NO OTHER TIRE WAS TO BE USED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR A SINGLE TIRE TO CREATE A MIXED SET. (LAWYER ON BEHALF OF CLIENT) *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161452July 5, 2006LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE:LOCK
LATCH ON VAN'S BACK HATCH DOOR BROKE DURING OPENING, CAUSING INABILITY TO OPEN BACK HATCH DOOR. NO EXCESSIVE PRESSURE WAS USED DURING OPENING, ONLY THE NORMAL GRIPPING MOTION TO OPEN THE LATCH. WHEN BROUGHT TO DEALERSHIP WE PURCHASED VAN FROM, WE WERE QUOTED $350, AS THEY NEEDED TO "TAKE THE WHOLE DOOR APART." WE TOOK THE VAN TO TWO OTHER PLACES FOR AN ESTIMATE, BOTH WHICH THOUGHT THIS WAS A RECALL ISSUE (THOUGH ACCORDING TO THE DEALERSHIP THIS WAS NOT A RECALL ISSUE). FINALLY WE BROUGHT THE VAN TO A PRIVATE MECHANIC WHO ORDERED THE $45 TOYOTA PART, AND HE WAS ABLE TO PLACE IT IN LESS THAN 30 MINUTES WITHOUT TAKING THE DOOR APART. *NM
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161379July 4, 2006SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS
I HAVE A 2005 TOYOTA SIENNA VAN THAT HAS INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE. IT NORMALLY OCCURS WHEN THE CAR IS COLD. I HAVE RUN SEVERAL RED LIGHTS WITH THE BRAKE PEDAL PRESSED COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR AND MY WIFE HAS DRIVEN THROUGH TWO YARDS. THE BRAKES FUNCTION NORMALLY ON THE FIRST SEVERAL APPLICATIONS BUT ON THE THIRD OR FOURTH APPLICATION THEY WILL OCCASIONALLY FAIL. MY DEALERSHIP HAS REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER AND DONE "DIAGNOSTICS" AT LEAST 8 DIFFERENT TIMES BUT CONSISTENTLY FIND NOTHING. THEY DID TELL ME THAT OTHER VEHICLES WERE EXPERIENCING THE SAME SORTS OF PROBLEM AND IT HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH A NEW VALVE TIMING ON THE 2005 MODEL AND THE VACUUM WAS INSUFFICIENT UNTIL THE CAR WAS WARM AND THAT I SHOULD IDLE FOR 5 MINUTES BEFORE DRIVING. THIS SEEMS TO WORK MORE CONSISTENTLY BUT I STILL HAVE EPISODES OF POOR BRAKING. WE HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO HAVE THIS RESOLVED FOR ALMOST 18 MONTHS. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161395July 4, 2006POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
WE HAVE A 1998 TOYOTA SIENNA LE WITH ABOUT 88,000 MILES ON IT. WE DO NOT DRIVE THE CAR TOO MUCH AND MOST OF THE TIME IT SITS IN OUR GARAGE. ON THE WAY UP TO NH FROM NJ AT JUNE 17 2006, THE TRANSMISSION STARTED TO HAVE PROBLEMS, WHICH THE TRANSMISSION WAS SOMETIMES UNABLE TO ENGAGE. WE FINALLY MADE IT HOME AND SENT THE CAR TO THE TOYOTA DEALER. THE DEALER TOLD US "THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE." THAT ARE KNOWN FOR TRANSMISSION FAILURES. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE EXTENDED WARRANTY COVERED UP TO 100,000 MILES AND 8 YEARS. BUT OUR CAR JUST PASSED IT BY 5-6 WEEKS AND IS WELL UNDER 100,000 MILES. DEALER TOLD US TO CONTACT TOYOTA AS IT JUST PAST THE DEADLINE AND HAS LOW MILEAGE. TOYOTA HAS GIVEN US A VERY HARD TIME. THEY INSISTED THAT IT IS OUR PROBLEM NOW BECAUSE WE DIDN'T DISCOVER IT BEFORE THE 8 YEARS DEADLINE. HERE IS WHAT IS LISTED ABOUT IN THE NHTSA.GOV WEBSITE THAT LISTS TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETINS: *NM MAKE: TOYOTA MODEL: SIENNA YEAR: 1998 TYPE: PASSENGER CAR SERVICE BULLETIN NUMBER: TC03014 NHTSA ITEM NUMBER: 10003372 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: EXTENDED WARRANTY COVERAGE REGARDING A NO MOVEMENT OR A SLIPPING CONDITION OF THE AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLE. *TT
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10161323July 3, 2006TIRES, TIRES:PRESSURE MONITORING AND REGULATING SYSTEMS
CATASTROPHIC TIRE FAILURE ON A TOYOTA SIENNA AWD VAN WITH RUN FLAT TIRES. FORTUNATELY, NO MAJOR INJURIES OR DAMAGE THIS TIME. THE TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM FAILED TO SENSE THE LACK OF PRESSURE IN ONE OF THE TIRES. DRIVING ON THE TIRE WITH NO AIR PRESSURE CAUSED CATASTROPHIC TIRE FAILURE. I WAS TOLD BY THE TOYOTA DEALER THE TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING DID NOT MALFUNCTION, IT SIMPLY DOES NOT WORK. IT CANNOT BE FIXED SINCE TOYOTA SAYS THERE IS NOTHING WRONG. *JB
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0