Volvo Car USA, LLC (Volvo Car) is recalling certain 2019-2022 V60CC, XC60, and XC90 vehicles. During steering gear assembly, double screws may have been assembled on top of each other, which can cause a screw to fall into the gearbox housing.
Volvo Car USA, LLC (Volvo Car) is recalling certain 2019-2020 V90, XC60, S60, V60, V60CC, S90, V90CC, S90L, and XC90 vehicles. The low-pressure fuel pump can blow a fuse and fail.
Volvo Car of N.A., LLC (Volvo Cars) is recalling certain 2018-2020 XC60 vehicles. The nuts that secure the front wipers may not have been sufficiently tightened, possibly causing the wipers to not function properly.
Volvo Cars USA LLC (Volvo Cars) is recalling certain 2019-2020 S60, V60, V60 Cross Country, S90L, V90, V90 Cross Country, XC40, XC60, and XC90 vehicles. Due to a software/hardware incompatibility, the Automatic Emergency Brake (AEB) system may not detect obstacles and engage as intended.
Volvo Car USA LLC (Volvo) is recalling certain 2018-2019 XC60 and S90 vehicles. The driver and passenger front seat rail rear flange nuts may not have been installed during assembly.
Complaint is regarding the known A/C evaporator failure in my 2019 Volvo XC60 Inscription with approximately 60,000 miles and Volvo’s subsequent denial of goodwill assistance. Disappointing Volvo denied assistance on the grounds that we had “not been loyal enough” despite having purchased 2 new vehicles from them. Both were extensively serviced at Volvo before we moved several hours away from the nearest Volvo dealership, my vehicle remained fully maintained and exceptionally low mileage. Volvo issued Technical Journal TJ 35912.1.0 addressing A/C evaporator repairs including instructions for an additional resistor/in-line jumper cable during replacement. I notified Volvo of the A/C problems during peak of summer, when I was moving across [XXX] with animals. The service department was rude and offered no meaningful solution—not even a reasonable path to getting my vehicle repaired or ensuring I had access to a safe, usable vehicle. My vehicle’s interior has reached temperatures exceeding 120°F. Children, elderly and animals cannot ride in the car. The NHTSA warns that vehicle interiors can heat up by approximately 20°F in just 10 minutes, and the CDC recognizes extreme heat exposure as a potentially life-threatening risk. denying assistance because we supposedly have not been loyal enough—despite purchasing two new fully loaded vehicles and maintaining our vehicle properly—is unacceptable customer service and falls far short of the expectations associated with a premium automotive brand. We planned to purchase another xc60 within a year, how can we? Volvos quality, reliability, and responsible customer support is no where to be found. A costly component failure at approximately 60,000 miles, combined with the lack of assistance during extreme heat and a denial based on our alleged lack of loyalty, has seriously undermined my confidence in the brand. I am asking Volvo to take responsibility for addressing this situation and provide a fair resolution. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
No injuries · No fire · No crash
I was involved in a serious motor vehicle collision involving my Volvo. The collision was essentially a head-on impact that occurred following a medical emergency. The vehicle sustained significant damage in the collision and is essentially totaled. During the crash, all of the vehicle's airbags DID NOT deploy with the exception of the right curtain airbag. I am concerned that the airbags did not deploy during this severe collision and may have failed to function as designed. As a result of the collision, I sustained significant injuries, including a broken tibia (which required surgery) and four fractured vertebrae in my back. I am reporting this incident to Volvo because I am concerned about the performance and deployment of the vehicle's supplemental restraint system, specifically the failure of all of the airbags, including the steering wheel air bag, to deploy during what was essentially a head-on collision. I would like Volvo to investigate the vehicle, including the airbag system, sensors, control module, crash data, and the reason the airbags did not deploy. I would also like the findings of the investigation documented and provided to me.
Our Nest Protect woke us at 06:30 am saying it was detecting smoke in the garage. Upon entering the garage it was obvious that the cabin of the car was filled with white smoke. Disconnected car from charger port. Attended to drive car out of garage to protect the house, but opening the door just let smoke billow out. Closed the door and called 911. Fire truck arrived - the winched the car out of the garage to protect the house. Using their thermal imaging camera determined the hybrid battery was the hotspot, not any of the charging connections. They ran water into back seat where that battery is located for over two hours to keep it from pop further thermal runaway. Clearly an internal EV battery short. Fire fighters had a sensor and detected residual HCN (hydrogen cyanide gas) and I had to be treated at the ER as a precaution as I inhaled a large amount of smoke when I opened the car door initially.
The driver's seatbelt buckle interlock stopped working, although engaged, and the auto's system no longer showed whether the seat belt was buckled up or not. This likely would have resulted in the passive restraint system not functioning if there were an accident. There are on-line comments about this same issue in this same model and year. The buckle was replaced at a cost of over $300 by the dealer and the dealer reported that there was a short or break in one of the wires. The vehicle has 87,000 miles at the present time.
No injuries · No fire · No crash
While driving at 10 mph on a residential street, I experienced a sudden and dangerous loss of power braking assistance, making the pedal nearly impossible to depress. An expert Volvo technician has confirmed that the brake vacuum pump failed because the exhaust camshaft, which drives the pump, sheared or failed internally. I want to emphasize that this catastrophic mechanical failure occurred at only 45,000 miles. A camshaft is a non-wear item that should last the lifetime of the vehicle; for it to fail at such low mileage and take out the braking system is an unreasonable safety risk. This is a known issue (Internal Ref: TJ 29131) that directly links an engine defect to a primary safety system failure. The vehicle has been properly maintained, and the failed parts are available for inspection."
No injuries · No fire · No crash