Mercury Milan Complaints
2,579 consumer complaints on file.
- #10641403October 4, 2014STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
THE INSIDE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR HANDLE BROKE FROM UNDER THE DOOR PANEL AND BECAME INOPERABLE. THIS REQUIRED THE INSIDE DOOR HANDLE TO BE REPLACED ON OR ABOUT 10/2009. CAR WAS PURCHASED NEW IN OCT. 2006, HAD LESS THAN 30,000 MILES AND WAS RARELY OCCUPIED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE DRIVER I.E. THE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR WAS RARELY USED. SINCE THEN, BOTH INSIDE REAR DOOR HANDLES ARE BECOMING DIFFICULT TO OPERATE AND WILL MOST LIKELY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE. ON OR ABOUT 9/15/2014, THE FRONT INSIDE PASSENGER DOOR HANDLE WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY REPLACED AGAIN BECAME INOPERABLE AND HAD TO BE REPLACED ON 10/2/2014. THE FRONT DRIVER INSIDE DOOR HANDLE BROKE AND BECAME INOPERABLE ON OR ABOUT 9/30/2014 AND WAS REPLACED ALSO ON 10/2/2014. THE HANDLES APPEAR TO BE OF VERY POOR QUALITY AND DO NOT HOLD UP AT ALL. IF THE REAR DOORS WERE USED MORE FREQUENTLY, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO REPLACE THEM ALSO AT THIS TIME. CURRENT CAR MILEAGE IS 92000 MILES. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10641271October 3, 2014ENGINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE VEHICLE STALLED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 32,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10640282September 30, 2014WHEELS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MERCURY MILAN. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO STATED THAT THE WHEEL STUD NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 11V574000 (WHEELS). THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 60,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10639843September 29, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
MY NEIGHBOR INFORMED ME THAT THE REAR BRAKE LIGHT IS OUT. IT IS NOT SAFE AND IT IS ILLEGAL TO DRIVE WITHOUT FULLY OPERATING BRAKE LIGHTS. THIS CAR ONLY HAS 30,000 MILES ON IT. FORD HAS TO REPLACE A COMPLETE REAR LAMP MODULE WHICH INCLUDES OTHER REAR LIGHTS THAT STILL WORK, TO THE TUNE OF $300 TO$400. MY BROTHER-IN-LAW HAS OWNED 50+ CARS OVER MANY YEARS AND HE SAID HE HAS NEVER HAD TO REPLACE A BRAKE LIGHT. FORD SHOULD BE REPLACING THESE DEFECTIVE LED BRAKE LIGHTS AS A TECHNICAL/SAFETY RECALL. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10639661September 28, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
WHEN HEADLIGHTS ARE ON RIGHT BRAKE LIGHT REMAINS ILLUMINATED AT ALL TIMES. REPLACED THE LIGHT AND SAME PROBLEM REMAINS. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10639246September 26, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
THE TAILLIGHT FIXTURE ON MY 2010 MERCURY MILAN IS NOW BAD AND FORD WANTS $400 TO REPLACE IT. IT IS AN LED FIXTURE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BURNT OUT BY NOW. I CANNOT REPLACE THE BULB ON MY OWN, THE WHOLE FIXTURE MUST BE REPLACED. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10633859September 17, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
I PURCHASED THE CAR NEW IN AUGUST 2010. IN JUNE 2012 I NOTICED A PROBLEM WITH THE LEFT TAIL/BRAKE LIGHT. WHEN THE HEADLIGHTS WERE OFF, THE BRAKE LIGHTS WORKED PROPERLY WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. HOWEVER, WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON, INSTEAD OF THE LEFT TAIL LIGHT BEING ON, THE BRIGHTER BRAKE LIGHT WAS ON ALL THE TIME. THIS COULD LEAD THE DRIVER BEHIND ME TO THINK I AM APPLYING MY BRAKES WHEN I AM NOT. THE REAR LAMPS ON THIS CAR ARE LED, NOT REGULAR BULBS. THE ONLY FIX IS TO REPLACED THE ENTIRE SEALED ASSEMBLY; THE CAR WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, SO THE DEALER REPLACED THE LAMP ASSEMBLY AT NO CHARGE. NOW, 2 YEARS LATER, I AM HAVING A SIMILAR PROBLEM WITH THE LAMP ASSEMBLY THAT WAS REPLACED. SINCE THE CAR IS NOW OUT OF WARRANTY, FORD WILL NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I WOULD HAVE TO PURCHASE THE LAMP ASSEMBLY (WHICH MY RESEARCH SHOWS IS A DEALER-ONLY PART) FOR OVER $400. AND PRESUMABLY, WHEN IT FAILS AGAIN AFTER 2 YEARS, I GET TO SPEND ANOTHER $400 FOR ANOTHER ONE. SINCE MILANS ARE NO LONGER BEING MADE, WHAT WILL WE DO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD WHEN THIS PART IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE FROM ANYONE AT ANY PRICE? JUNK THE CAR BECAUSE THE REAR LIGHTS DON'T WORK PROPERLY? I HAVE RESEARCHED THIS, AND MANY MILAN OWNERS HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. THIS IS CLEARLY A SAFETY ISSUE, AND IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THESE ASSEMBLIES ARE DEFECTIVE. I FEEL THAT FORD SHOULD REDESIGN THESE TO BE RELIABLE (OR ALTERNATIVELY, DESIGN A REPLACEMENT THAT USES STANDARD BULBS INSTEAD OF LEDS), THEN ISSUE A RECALL AND REPLACE THEM AT NO CHARGE FOR THE LIFE OF THE CAR. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10637014September 17, 2014SERVICE BRAKES, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, EXTERIOR LIGHTING
I WAS MADE AWARE OF MY TAIL LIGHT NOT FUNCTIONING WHEN I APPLIED THE BRAKES. WHEN I TRIED TO REPLACE THE BULB, I SOON LEARNED THAT THE BRAKE LIGHT IS LED AND A SEALED UNIT, MAKING IT VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO REPAIR. THE REPLACEMENT UNIT IS ASTRONOMICALLY EXPENSIVE, PRICES BETWEEN $150-$350 USED. IF THE UNIT HAD A REPLACEABLE BULB, THEN I WOULDN'T EVEN BE WRITING THIS. I UNDERSTAND THAT NOTHING WILL MOST LIKELY BE DONE ABOUT THIS, BUT IT IS WORTH NOTING THAT THIS IS A SAFETY CONCERN THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10637891September 17, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
I PURCHASED THIS CAR USED FROM THE DEALER. AFTER ONLY TWO DAYS, I WAS TOLD MY BRAKE LIGHT IS OUT. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, THE DEALER REPLACED THE RIGHT TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY. 9/17/14, THE BRAKE LIGHTS APPEAR TO WORK,UNTIL THE HEAD LIGHTS COME ON OR ARE TURNED ON. THE LEFT REAR BRAKE LIGHT DOES NOT COME ON AND THE RIGHT LIGHT STAYS ILLUMINATED, AS IF THE BRAKES ARE BEING APPLIED, WHEN THE HEAD LIGHTS ARE IN USE. I AM TOLD BY THE DEALER THE REAR BRAKE LIGHT ASSEMBLY AGAIN NEEDS REPLACED, BUT WILL COST $400.00. OBVIOUS DEFECT OR MALFUNCTION IN THE SAFETY FEATURE (BRAKE LIGHTS).
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10636865September 14, 2014UNKNOWN OR OTHER
IN AUGUST OF THIS YEAR I WAS PULLED OVER BY A POLICE OFFICE WHO TOLD ME THAT MY BRAKE LIGHTS WERE ON BUT NOT MY TAIL LIGHTS. I TOOK MY CAR TO THE FORD DEALER IN ROCKWALL TO FIND OUT THAT THE COST OF THIS TO REPLACE BOTH MY TAIL LIGHTS WAS $1018.10. HAD THIS OFFICER NOT STOPPED ME I WOULD HAVE NEVER KNOWN THIS. I FIND IT TO BE A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION AS THE PERSON BEHIND ME WOULD NOT HAVE KNOWN THAT I WAS STOPPING BECAUSE THE BRAKE LIGHTS WERE THE ONLY THING WORKING. PLEASE CHECK INTO THIS AS I SEE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT HAPPENING.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10632974September 13, 2014FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM, POWER TRAIN
WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY ON 9/2, THE WRENCH WARNING LIGHT CAME ON AND THE CAR LOST POWER AND STARTED SHAKING. WE HAD TO DODGE TRAFFIC TO LIMP OFF THE ROAD AND STOPPED THE ENGINE. UPON STARTING AGAIN, THE WARNING LIGHT WAS CLEARED AND WE HESITANTLY DROVE HOME. WE CALLED THE LOCAL FORD DEALERSHIP AND WERE TOLD THAT IF THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, TO NOT SHUT OFF THE ENGINE AND TO DRIVE DIRECTLY TO THE DEALERSHIP. THE NEXT DAY (9/3) MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE CAR ALONE AND THE WARNING CAME ON AGAIN, SHE LOST SPEED AND THE VEHICLE STARTED SHAKING BADLY. SHE LIMPED AS SAFELY AS SHE TO THE DEALERSHIP AND WAS TOLD SHE HAD TO LEAVE THE CAR THERE BECAUSE IT WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. THE FOLLOWING DAY (9/4) WE WERE TOLD THAT THE THROTTLE BODY (ETB) NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. BECAUSE WE NEEDED THE CAR FOR A DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENT AND BECAUSE THE CAR WAS "UNSAFE TO DRIVE", WE AUTHORIZED THEM TO REPLACE THE ETB. AFTER RESEARCHING THE ISSUE, WE FOUND THAT THE ETB WAS EXACTLY THE SAME ONE THAT WAS PART OF THE NHTSA INVESTIGATION, WHICH INCLUDED THE ESCAPE/ MARINER HYBRIDS, BUT SURPRISINGLY DID NOT INCLUDE THE FUSION/MILAN HYBRIDS. TO PRECLUDE A MASSIVE RECALL, FORD LAUNCHED A CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM THAT BLATANTLY EXCLUDED THE FUSION/ MILAN HYBRIDS, EVEN THOUGH THEY USE THE IDENTICAL DEFECTIVE ETB. AS PART OF THE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM, FORD ISSUED EXTENDED WARRANTIES OF 10 YR/150,000 MILES FOR THE ETB. SINCE THE SAME DEFECTIVE ETB WAS USED IN THE 2010 FUSION/MILAN HYBRIDS, IT POSES THE SAME SAFETY ISSUE AS IN THE OTHER "COVERED" VEHICLES. AS SUCH, IT SHOULD BE FURTHER SCRUTINIZED BY THE NHTSA AND/OR SUBSEQUENTLY COVERED BY THE SAME FORD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM. FORD CLEVERLY CONCEDED TO THE PROGRAM TO PRECLUDE A MASSIVE RECALL AND THEN BLATANTLY EXCLUDED 40,000 TO 50,000 FUSION/MILAN HYBRIDS, THAT ARE EQUALLY DEFECTIVE AND UNSAFE. NHTSA, PLEASE HELP. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10632655September 12, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
NOTICED LEFT OUTER TAILLIGHT FLICKERING IN JULY 2014. LIGHT FINALLY WENT OUT. ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WAS CHANGED ON 9/1914. ON 9/9/14 NOTICED THE SAME FLICKERING. LIGHT HAS NOT GONE OUT YET BUT IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME. DEALER WANTS $114 JUST TO LOOK AT IT. THERE ARE A LOT OF COMPLAINTS WITH THIS MODEL. NEEDS RECALL. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10632516September 11, 2014FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM, POWER TRAIN
I WAS DRIVING DOWN I75S IN VERY SLOW TRAFFIC. AS I WAS APPROACHING AM ACCIDENT. I NOTICED THE CAR STALLING OR JERKING A LITTLE. THE WRENCH SENSOR CAME ON IN THE CAR. I GOT OVER 2 LANES OF TRAFFIC TO THE SHOULDER & CHECKED THE CAR. I DIDN'T SEE ANY OBVIOUS PROBLEMS SO I TURNED IT OFF WAITED A FEW SECONDS & STARTED IT BACK UP. THE WRENCH LIGHT WENT OFF BUT THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON. I GOT OFF THE EXIT & TURNED AROUND TO COME HOME. THE CAR DID FINE. I TOOK THE CAR TO MY LOCAL FORD DEALER FOR A DIAGNOSTIC TEST & THEY SAID THE THROTTLE BODY WAS FAILING & WOULD EVENTUALLY LEAVE ME STRANDED. I AM TRYING TO GET THIS ISSUE TAKEN CAR OF SOON. I'VE SEEN SEVERAL OTHER PEOPLE WITH THE SAME ISSUES AS MINE ONLINE WITH NC CARS & WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE IS ANY RECALL INFO REGARDING THIS SUBJECT. I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO WORK BC THIS IS MY ONLY CAR & IM SCARED TO GET STRANDED. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10632060September 10, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
A FEW TIMES, PEOPLE DRIVING BEHIND ME HAVE BEEPED AT ME AND I DIDN'T KNOW WHY OTHER THAN MAYBE THEY WERE UPSET I WASN'T DRIVING FAST ENOUGH. THEN ABOUT TWO MONTHS AGO, A POLICE OFFICER PULLED ME OVER TO WARN ME MY TAIL LIGHT WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY AND TO GET IT FIXED. THE OUTER(QUARTER PANEL) LED TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY IS NOT WORKING PROPERLY AND THIS COULD CAUSE AN ACCIDENT FROM BEHIND. I BROUGHT THE CAR TO NAZARETH FORD, WHICH STATED THAT THE LED LIGHTS ARE SUPPOSED TO LAST MUCH MORE THAN FOUR YEARS, BUT IS NOT UNDER WARRANTY. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10632102September 10, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 MERCURY MILAN. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 20 MPH, THE CONTACT WAS ALERTED BY ANOTHER MOTORIST THAT THE REAR DRIVER SIDE BRAKE LIGHT FAILED TO ILLUMINATE. THE INDEPENDENT MECHANIC DIAGNOSED THAT THE REAR DRIVER SIDE TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED AND THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 37,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10631748September 9, 2014FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
MY 2010 MERCURY MILAN HYBRID THREW THE WRENCH LIGHT TWICE LAST WEEK. BOTH TIMES, IT LOST NEARLY ALL POWER, AND I HAD TO COME TO A COMPLETE STOP ON THE HIGHWAY. MY FORD DEALER DETERMINED IT WAS THE THROTTLE BODY, FORCING THE VEHICLE INTO A SOFTWARE ENFORCED LIMP MODE. UPON DOING SOME RESEARCH I DISCOVERED THAT THROTTLE BODIES IN MILANS, FUSIONS, AND OTHER VEHICLES HAVE BEEN COVERED BY CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N03 FOR 150,000 MILES & 10 YEARS. FOR SOME REASON THE HYBRID MODEL HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE PROGRAM, INCLUDING A SOFTWARE UPDATE TO PREVENT THE CAR FROM BECOMING DANGEROUSLY UNDERPOWERED IF THE OLD PART FAILED. I HAVE CALLED FORD TWICE, AND BEEN DEEPLY DISSATISFIED WITH HOW MY ISSUE HAS BEEN HANDLED. THEY SEEM TO HAVE NO IDEA WHY THEY EXCLUDED THE HYBRIDS, PERHAPS IT WAS AN OVERSIGHT. THE DEALER HAS VERIFIED THAT THE PART THAT WAS REPLACED IS THE SAME EXACT PART BEING SUPPLIED FOR CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N03. I PAID NEARLY DOUBLE AND TOOK A RISK ON BUYING AN EARLY FORD HYBRID. MY CAR HAS ABOUT 1/3 OF THE MILES AND IS ONLY HALF AS OLD AS MANY CARS WITH THE SAME PART THAT HAVE RECEIVED SOFTWARE UPDATES AND FREE REPLACEMENTS WHEN REQUIRED. MY DEALER HAS VERIFIED THAT THE PART THAT WAS REPLACED IS THE SAME PART NUMBER BEING REPLACED UNDER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N03. IT IS DANGEROUS FOR FORD TO NOT NOTIFY HYBRID CUSTOMERS OF THE FAULTY PART, AND EVEN MORE DANGEROUS NOT TO ADDRESS IT VIA SOFTWARE AND IF NECESSARY REPLACEMENT, AS THEY HAVE DONE WITH MOST ALL OTHER CARS USING THE PART. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10631905September 9, 2014SERVICE BRAKES
WHILE DRIVING DOWN THE STREET IF I HIT A BUMP OR POT HOLE WHILE PRESSING THE BRAKES THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR BUT DOES NOT RETURN TO NORMAL POSITION. THE CAR WILL COME TO A STOP AND THE BRAKES WILL ENGAGE TO STOP THE CARE BUT THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR BEFORE IT WILL STOP. THE FIRST TIME IT HAPPENED THE PEDAL RETURNED TO THE POSITION A FEW HOURS LATER. AFTER MULTIPLE TIMES OF TURNING THE CAR ON AND OFF. THE SECOND TIME IT HAPPENED I TOOK IT INTO THE CAR DEALERSHIP. THEY DID GET THE CAR TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM BUT SAID THAT THEY COULDN'T FIND A PROBLEM WITH MY BRAKES. THE DEALERSHIP CONTACTED FORD AND WAS TOLD THAT THEY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THAT PROBLEM AND IT MAY JUST BE A CHARACTERISTIC OF MY CAR. I ALSO CONTACTED FORD MYSELF AND THEY TOLD ME THEY HAVE NOTHING ON RECORD FOR A PROBLEM LIKE THAT AND TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER DEALERSHIP AND HAVE THEM LOOK AT IT. FORD CUSTOMER CARE KEPT TELLING ME THAT MY CAR WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY. IT HAS SINCE HAPPENED A COUPLE MORE TIMES BUT NOW THE PEDAL IS NOT RETURNING TO NORMAL POSITION IT IS GOING TO THE FLOOR BEFORE THE CAR STOPS. I KNOW MY CAR IS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY I JUST WANT TO GET THE PROBLEM FIXED. I CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A CHARACTERISTIC OF MY CAR THAT I HAVE OWNED FOR 5 YEARS AND NEVER HAD THIS PROBLEM BEFORE THIS.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10631525September 8, 2014ENGINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MERCURY MILAN. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE VEHICLE VIBRATED AND THE THROTTLE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE OPERATED NORMALLY ONCE IT WAS SHUT OFF AND RESTARTED. THE FAILURE OCCURRED MULTIPLE TIMES. THE ENGINE WARNING INDICATOR ALSO ILLUMINATED SPORADICALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 35,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10631319September 7, 2014EXTERIOR LIGHTING
LED TAIL LIGHTS FAILED FOR THE SECOND TIME. THE COST OF THE REPLACEMENT TAIL LIGHTS IS ASTRONOMICAL AT 376.00 EACH. THERE WAS NO COLLISION, NO WATER INTRUSION. THEY JUST FAILED. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10629920September 1, 2014STEERING
WHEN DRIVING ON THE EXPRESSWAY, THE STEERING WAS JERKY AND STICKING. I GOT AN ERROR MESSAGE SAYING "SERVICE POWER STEERING" AND "SERVICE ADVANCETRAC". TODAY, WHEN I WENT TO START THE CAR, I HAVE THE MESSAGE SAYS "SERVICE POWER STEERING NOW" AND THE WHEEL WILL NOT TURN. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0