Chrysler Pacifica Complaints (2004)

896 consumer complaints on file.

#10514829June 3, 2013
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, STRUCTURE
BEING IN THE DIESEL /AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR MORE THAN 25 YEARS I WAS SHOCKED TO SEE THAT THE ENGINE CRADLE WAS ROTTING FROM THE INSIDE OUT. I DO ALL MY OWN SERVICE WORK ON ALL MY VEHICLES AND I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE SUB-FRAME ON ANY VEHICLE CORRODE THE WAY THIS VEHICLE HAD. LARGE RUSTED OUT HOLES IN THE CROSS MEMBERS AND SUB-FRAME. LIKE EVERYONE ELSE WITH THIS ISSUE, I DID A BUNCH OF RESEARCH BOTH ON THE INTERNET AND TALKING WITH THE DEALER AND FOUND OUT THAT CHRYSLER DID ISSUE A TSB ON THIS PROBLEM. THE TSB ONLY COVERS VEHICLES IN THE NORTH REGION AND ONLY IN SALT LADEN STATES. BUT WHAT REALLY BURNS ME IS THE BUILD DATES CHRYSLER ONLY WILL COVER. CHRYSLER WILL ONLY COVER VEHICLES BUILT FROM APPROXIMATELY FEBRUARY TO MARCH 2004, AND IF YOUR CAR IS OUTSIDE THAT WINDOW, TOO BAD. IN MY OPINION MY CAR IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE, SO NOW I HAVE A CAR THAT DECORATES MY DRIVEWAY. CHRYSLER WILL NOT COVER ANYTHING BECAUSE OF WHEN MY CAR WAS BUILT AS COMPARED TO THE BUILD WINDOW. THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT CHRYSLER HAS KNOWN ABOUT FOR A WHILE AND SHOULD STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT. I FEEL CHRYSLER IS GIVING THEIR CUSTOMERS THE SHAFT WITH A VERY SERIOUS ISSUE. WHY DO PEOPLE HAVE TO DIE OR GET SERIOUSLY INURED BEFORE OEM'S ACTUALLY TAKE CARE OF A SERIOUS ISSUE LIKE THIS. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10511565May 12, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
I TOOK MY PACIFICA FOR A FRONT END ALIGNMENT TO GET THE NEWS THAT MY SUBFRAME IS RUSTED THROUGH AND THAT THE CAR WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. I THEN CALLED CHRYSLER TO ACT UPON A PARTS EXTENDED WARRANTY THAT WAS TO COVER THIS ISSUE, COME TO FIND OUT MY VIN NUMBER DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THIS WARRANTY, MY CAR WAS MADE 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE WARRANTY WAS ISSUED FOR THIS MAKE AND MODEL. MY QUESTION IS.... IF THEY KNOW THAT THE SUBFRAME IS BAD ON THIS MAKE AND MODEL WHY DOESN'T EVERY 04/05 FALL UNDER THIS WARRANTY? THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS LOGIC. THE SUBFRAME IS BAD AND CHRYSLER NEEDS TO BACK UP THERE FAULTY PRODUCT. WE LOVE THIS CAR AND HOPED TO HAVE IT AROUND FOR A LONG TIME, BUT NOW IT IS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN. I"M LIKE MOST AMERICAN'S THESE DAYS AND CANT AFFORD TO PAY 1200 DOLLARS OUT OF POCKET TO HAVE THIS DANGEROUS PROBLEM FIXED. SHAME ON YOU CHRYSLER FOR MAKING AN AMERICAN MADE PRODUCT UNSAFE, YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER AND STAND BY YOUR PRODUCT AND YOUR CONSUMER BY FIXING THESE UNSAFE VEHICLES TRANSPORTING FAMILIES ALL OVER THE ROADS. I HOPE THE NEXT TIME WE POST HERE IT WILL BE TO SAY THAT CHRYSLER STOOD BEHIND THEIR BRAND AND TOOK CARE OF THEIR CUSTOMERS THE WAY OTHER MANUFACTURES WOULD. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10511320May 9, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
WHEN I GOT MY WHEELS FIXED I WAS LOOKING ON THE MY CAR AND ME AND THE MECHANIC NOTICED THAT THE SUBFRAME WAS RUSTY HE TOLD ME THAT IT WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE MY CAR CAUSE MY ENGINE CAN FALL OUT ANY MINUTES. WHEN I WAS DOING SOME RESEARCH I DISCOVERED DAD IS HIS OWN COMMON PROBLEM WITH CHRYSLER PACIFICAS. TO MY KNOWLEDGE THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN WITH A CAR FROM 2004 SO I'M WRITING THIS COMPLAINTS BECAUSE I THINK CHRYSLER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING THE SUBFRAME. THIS REPAIRIS GOING TO COST ME AT LEAST A THOUSAND DOLLARS NO I DON'T HAVE THAT MONEY AND I'M PAYING ON THE CAR SO PLEASE CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT'S I CAN DO. GIRLS I KNOW IF I'M NOT THE FIRST ONE WHO IS COMPLAINING ABOUT THIS. MY EMAIL IS [XXX] THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10510258May 1, 2013
STRUCTURE:BODY
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR TIRE SERVICE WHEN HE WAS ADVISED THAT THAT THE SUB FRAME WAS RUSTED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THEY ADVISED THAT THE FRAME NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10509189April 22, 2013
ENGINE, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
THE VEHICLE WAS BEING DRIVEN WHEN SUDDENLY SMOKE STARTS COMING FROM THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT PULLED OVER TO CHECK UNDER THE HOOD AND FLAMES BEGAN COMING OUT CLOSED THE HOOD AND THE VEHICLE JUST BURNED DOWN TO THE GROUND CALLED 911 FIREFIGHTER CAME AND PUT OUT THE FIRE IT WAS ALL SO FAST ITS UNREAL. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
Yes
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10508277April 15, 2013
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 60 MPH, THE DRIVER NOTICED THERE WAS A HALF OF A TANK OF FUEL. SHORTLY THEREAFTER, THE FUEL GAUGE RAPIDLY MOVED TO EMPTY AND THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A REFUELING STATION WHERE THE TANK ONLY ALLOWED TEN GALLONS DESPITE HAVING A TWENTY GALLON TANK. AS HE TOOK THE VEHICLE HOME, THE GAUGE AGAIN RAPIDLY MOVED TO THE HALFWAY MARK AND THEN EMPTY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSIS WHO REFERRED HIM TO A DEALER. THE DEALER DIAGNOSED THE VEHICLE WITH HAVING BAD MODULES AND NEEDED A NEW FUEL TANK. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO ANOTHER DEALER WHO CONFIRMED THE DIAGNOSIS AND ALSO OFFERED TO PAY FOR HALF OF THE REPAIR. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 150,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10507503April 8, 2013
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, STRUCTURE
LOUD POPPING NOISE COMING FROM THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. TOLD BY THE DEALERSHIP IT IS THE MOTOR MOUNTS. AFTER RESEARCHING THE INTERNET THIS SEEMS TO BE A PROBLEM REPORTED BY MANY. EXTENDED WARRANTIES WILL NOT PAY FOR THIS ISSUE. PLEASE LET THE PUBLIC KNOW WHAT IS GOING HERE!! *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10507538April 8, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
WE HAVE JUST FOUND OUT THE SUB FRAME OF OUR 2004 PACIFICA IS SEVERELY RUSTED OUT. IT ONLY HAS 120,000 MILES ON IT AND IT ONLY 9 YEARS OLD! THERE IS NO RUST WHATSOEVER ON THE BODY OF THE CAR BUT UNDERNEATH IS COMPLETELY CORRODED. THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY HAZARD AND FROM WHAT I READ IT'S NOT UNCOMMON. CHRYSLER HAS ONLY ISSUED AN EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR THE SUBFRAME FOR A 30 DAY PERIOD OF PRODUCTION BUT APPARENTLY IT'S MORE THEN JUST THE ONES MADE IN THAT MONTH! CHRYSLER SAYS TO KEEP THE RECEIPTS IN CASE THE HAVE A RECALL BUT WHAT GETS ME IS WHY IS THERE NO RECALL YET!?! THIS IS NOT NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR AND AGAIN IT'S EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. THEY MUST OF SKIPPED A COAT OF PROTECTANT OR SOMETHING WENT WRONG BECAUSE IT'S NOT COINCIDENCE THAT THOUSANDS OF OTHER PEOPLE HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WITH THE 2004 / 2005 YEAR. YOU PURCHASE A VEHICLE TRUSTING TO PUT YOUR FAMILIES LIVE IN IT AND MAKE IT FROM POINT A TO B. BUT THE SUBFRAME IT THE LIFE LINE OF THE VEHICLE AND FOR CHRYSLER TO STILL NOT ISSUE A RECALL ON THIS IS PRETTY IRRESPONSIBLE ON THEIR PART! ONE OF THE EVEN SCARIER THINGS IS THAT OTHERS THAT ARE NOT AWARE OF THE PROBLEM ARE OUT THERE DRIVING THEIR VEHICLES ON THE ROAD AND COULD BE A HAZARD FOR OTHERS! *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10507196April 4, 2013
SEATS
THE POWER SEATS BOTH FRONT AREN'T WORKING AND THE PEDDLE ADJ. AND THE DRIVER SEAT IN BACK POSITION HARD TO DRIVE. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10505348April 2, 2013
STRUCTURE:BODY
WHEN TAKING THE CAR FOR AN OIL CHANGE, I LEARNED THE ENGINE CRADLE HAD RUSTED THROUGH AND CRACKED. AFTER RESEARCHING THE ISSUE, I DISCOVERED THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE FOR THIS CAR. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER, WHO CLAIMED THAT THE CAR WAS MADE 7 DAYS TOO EARLY TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY SORT OF COVERED REPAIR. THIS IS RIDICULOUS, AS MY VEHICLE CLEAR SUFFERS FROM THE SAME ISSUE. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10504828March 28, 2013
ENGINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHENEVER HE ACCELERATED, THE VEHICLE WOULD VIBRATED VERY HARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THEY STATED THAT THE FRONT ENGINE MOUNT HAD RUSTED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED BUT PROVIDED NO ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 107,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10504829March 28, 2013
ENGINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHENEVER HE WOULD ACCELERATE, THE VEHICLE WOULD VIBRATE VERY HARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THEY STATED THAT THE FRONT ENGINE MOUNT WAS RUSTED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED BUT PROVIDED NO ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 107,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10504738March 27, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT END MADE A LOUD NOISE WHEN DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A MECHANIC WHERE THE SUB FRAME WAS FOUND TO BE SEVERELY CORRODED. THE MANUFACTURER ADVISED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUB FRAME WARRANTY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 139,000. ..UPDATED 05/10/13 *BF UPDATED 05/24/2013 *JS
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10502540March 12, 2013
ENGINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE TEMPERATURE GAUGE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED AS THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THEY INFORMED THE CONTACT THAT THE ENGINE WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE DEFECT. THE APPROXIMATE MILEAGE WAS 150,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10502351March 11, 2013
SUSPENSION, ENGINE, STEERING:LINKAGES:TIE ROD ASSEMBLY
DRIVING AROUND 40 THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE. I THOUGHT MAYBE A WHEEL BEARING OR TIE ROD WAS THE ISSUE. UPON TAKING IT TO THE SHOP TO GET CHECKED I WAS TOLD THAT THE ENGINE CRADLE WAS RUSTED TO THE POINT OF ALMOST FAILING. I AM CURRENTLY HAVING THE CRADLE REPLACED. HAD THAT OCCURRED AT A HIGHER SPEED I HAT TO THINK WHAT MAY HAVE HAPPENED. I CALLED CHRYSLER AND WAS TOLD THERE IS A REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR VEHICLES BUILT BETWEEN FEB 23RD AND MAR31ST 2004. BECAUSE MY VEHICLE WAS BUILT JANUARY 23RD 2004 IT WAS NOT COVERED AND I RECEIVED NO LETTER. DESPITE THE FACT I WAS DRIVING A VEHICLE WITH THE SAME PROBLEM IN A VERY DANGEROUS STATE. THERE SHOULD BE A NATIONWIDE SAFETY RECALL. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10501980March 7, 2013
STRUCTURE:BODY
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT UNDER CARRIAGE OF THE VEHICLE WAS SEVERELY RUSTED. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED OF THE FAILURE WHEN HE TOOK THE VEHICLE FOR STATE INSPECTION AND THE VEHICLE FAILED. THE CONTACT SPOKE WITH THE MANUFACTURER, BUT WAS TOLD THAT THEY WOULD NOT COVER THE REPAIR. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 128,000. *TR UPDATED 5/28/13 *CN UPDATED 06/05/2013 *JS
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10500955March 1, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS, SUSPENSION
MY MECHANIC CALLED TO MY ATTENTION THAT THE SUB-FRAME ON MY 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA HAD RUSTED THROUGH AND DEVELOPED CRACKS ADJACENT TO THE RUSTED AREA. I WAS ADVISED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS UNSAFE AND THAT THE SUB-FRAME REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. THE LOCAL CHRYSLER DEALER WAS UNAWARE OF ANY RECALL, BUT CHECKING THE INTERNET I FOUND THIS CONDITION TO HAVE OCCURRED TO NUMEROUS OTHER PACIFICAS. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER CUSTOMER SERVICE WHO INFORMED ME THAT AN EXTENDED WARRANTY HAD BEEN ISSUED FOR 2004-2005 CHRYSLER PACIFICA PRODUCED DURING A SPECIFIC TIME PERIOD AND ORIGINALLY LICENSED IN "SNOW STATES". THE WARRANTY COVERS SUB-FRAME REPLACEMENT UP TO 10 YEARS AND 150,000 MILES. UNFORTUNATELY MY VEHICLE WAS PRODUCED A FEW MONTHS PRIOR TO THE WARRANTY COVERAGE PERIOD. IT IS QUITE UNLIKELY THAT THE SUB-FRAME WAS PRODUCED SATISFACTORILY AND THEN IT BECAME SUBSTANDARD - ESPECIALLY SINCE THE EARLIER PRODUCTION ON MY VEHICLE HAS RUSTED THROUGH. IT IS SHAMEFUL AND IRRESPONSIBLE THAT A COMPANY WITH AS MUCH HISTORY AND ENGINEERING CAPABILITIES HAS DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED A VEHICLE THAT BECOMES UNSAFE IN LESS THAN 10 YEARS OR 100,000 MILES. IF THEY ARE NOT ACCEPTING LIABILITY TO REPLACE THIS INFERIOR PART THEY SHOULD AT LEAST HAVE THE DECENCY TO HAVE CONTACTED OWNERS TO MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THERE IS A 'POTENTIAL FOR THE SUB-FRAME TO HAVE RUSTED TO A CONDITION THAT PRESENTS A SAFETY HAZARD.' *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10500796February 28, 2013
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH, THE FUEL LEVEL GAUGE DROPPED FROM INDICATING THAT THE VEHICLE WAS ONE HALF A TANK FULL TO EMPTY. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE DRIVING AN ADDITIONAL TEN MILES BEFORE THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE CONTACT ADDED A SMALL AMOUNT OF FUEL TO THE VEHICLE AND THE FUEL LEVEL GAUGE DISPLAYED THE TANK AS BEING THREE-FOURTHS FULL. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO RESTART THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE FUEL TANK WOULD NEED REPLACING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED BUT OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 102,000. UPDATED 04/30/13*LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE FUEL GAUGE WAS ALMOST AT A HALF TANK. SHE THEN HEARD THE GAS LOW WARNING CHIME AND WHEN SHE LOOKED DOWN, THE GAUGE WAS READY EMPTY. THE VEHICLE SHUT DOWN AND THE CONSUMER HAD TO STEER THE VEHICLE OFF TO THE SHOULDER WITH GREAT FORCE AND DIFFICULTY. THE CONSUMER STATED THE PRIMARY PUMP WAS REPLACED IN DECEMBER AND THE SECONDARY FUEL PUMP WAS REPLACED APRIL 6, 2013. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED WHEN SHE PUMP GAS, IT HAD TO BE DONE REALLY SLOW, OTHERWISE, IT WOULD FILL THE PIPE AND SHUT THE PUMP DOWN. IT WOULD TAKE ABOUT 5- 10 MINUTES JUST TO PUT 7 GALLONS OF GAS IN THE VEHICLE. UPADTED 05/08/13
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10496951February 9, 2013
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS, ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
TOOK CAR TO DEALER FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. DEALER SAID THAT THE CAR IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE AND THAT THE ENGINE SUBFRAME WAS CORRODED. AFTER AN INTERNET SEARCH FOUND THAT THIS IS A KNOWN AND COMMON PROBLEM AND THAT APPARENTLY THE PART WAS RECALLED IN CANADA. WHEN I SPOKE WITH CHRYSLER, THEY SAID THAT THEY WOULD NOT PROVIDE ANY SUPPORT, AND THAT HAD I "REPORTED THE PROBLEM WHEN IT STARTED" THEY WOULD HAVE REPAIRED IT UNDER WARRANTY. I HAVE HAD THE CAR REGULARLY SERVICED AT THE DEALER. AS A CONSUMER I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING IF THE ENGINE SUBFRAME IS CORRODED. HOWEVER, A DEALER WHO IS MAINTAINING THE CAR SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO SO. IN ANY EVENT, THE CAR IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE, I AM EXPECTED TO PAY A SIGNIFICANT SUM, AND THIS PROBLEM IS PERVASIVE. THE DEALER TOLD ME A SIMILAR CAR CAME THIS PAST WEEK WITH AN IDENTICAL PROBLEM. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10496458February 5, 2013
STRUCTURE:BODY
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE EXHIBITED ABNORMAL NOISES WHILE DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION. THE FAILURE WAS LOCATED AT THE SUB FRAME, WHICH WAS CORRODED AND FRACTURED INTO PIECES. THE MANUFACTURER ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER'S EXTENDED WARRANTY REPAIR DID NOT COVER THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 130,000
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0

← Back to Chrysler Pacifica