Volvo XC90 Complaints (2004)
462 consumer complaints on file.
- #10382885February 16, 2011ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 VOLVO XC90. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH, THE VEHICLE JERKED VIOLENTLY AND THE INSTRUMENT PANEL GAUGES FAILED. THE ENGINE WAS SHUT OFF AND THEN RESTARTED AFTER SEVERAL MINUTES. THE VEHICLE RESUMED NORMALLY FOR A SHORT PERIOD BEFORE THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THE MALFUNCTION OCCURRED AFTER DRIVING FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE HOURS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE FAULTY CEM UNIT WAS REPLACED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 98,003. UPDATED 3/21/11 *CN
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10382839February 15, 2011ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
CAR LOST ALL POWER. ALL DASHBOARD WENT OFF AND POWER STEERING WENT OUT WHILE DRIVING AT OVER 40 MILES AN HOUR ON THE HIGHWAY. THIS HAPPENED ON 4 DIFFERENT OCCASIONS. MILEAGE 123,000 2004 VOLVO XC90 T6. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10381022February 7, 2011UNKNOWN OR OTHER
ALL DASHLIGHTS WENT COMPLETELY BLACK, AND THE POWER STEERING WENT OUT WITH IT WHILE DRIVING DOWN THE FREEWAY (AT NIGHT). THIS HAPPENED ON THREE DIFFERENT OCCASIONS. VOLVO DEALER CLAIMED THEY "RESET" IT THE FIRST TWO FIXES AND THEN THE THIRD TIME REPLACED THE CEM, WHICH WAS A COUPLE THOUSAND DOLLAR FIX FOR ME. *LN
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10379579January 30, 2011ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, STRUCTURE
LIQUID (PROBABLY WATER) INSIDE THE FRAME OF VOLVO XC90 CAUSING ELECTRICAL ISSUES. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10378346January 23, 2011POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
I HAVE A 2004 VOLVO XC90. AT APPROXIMATELY 52K MILES, THE XC90 1ST GENERATION TRANSMISSION WENT BAD AND HAD TO BE REPLACED. CARLSEN VOLVO (PALO ALTO, CA) AGREED TO COVER THE COST OF THE TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT. I WAS VERY PLEASED WITH THE SERVICE AND WENT ON MY WAY. IN DECEMBER 2010 AT ~107,000K MILES, THE TRANSMISSION STARTED TO HESITATE & FUNCTION ERRATICALLY WHILE DRIVING. WITHIN AFEW DAYS, THE CAR WAS PARKED AT MY HOME, AND WAS UNABLE TO ENGAGE IN FORWARD OR REVERSE. I TOWED THE CAR IN; IT WAS DIAGNOSED W/ INTERNAL TRANSMISSION PROBLEM. THE SERVICE REP SAID THAT SHE WOULD TALK TO THE FACTORY REP REGARDING COMPENSATION. THE DEALER REP CALLED VOLVO N.A. REP, WYATT, WHO OFFERED TO PAY FOR THE PARTS (~$3,500) BUT I WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE LABOR(~$1,500). MY HUSBAND COUNTERED THAT WE WOULD LIKE THE WHOLE THING PAID FOR SINCE IT WAS WELL KNOWN FACTORY DEFECT. WHEN WYATT HEARD OF OUR COUNTER OFFER, HE NOT ONLY DENIED THIS, BUT SIMPLY STATED THAT THE DEAL WAS OFF THE TABLE, PERIOD. THE NEXT DAY, I RECONSIDERED AND ASKED THE SERVICE REP TO CALL WYATT AGAIN WITH OUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL DEAL. WYATT REFUSED TO PUT THE DEAL BACK ON THE TABLE AND SAID WE SHOULD PAY FOR THE REPAIRS OURSELVES. THEN CALLED VOLVO CUSTOMER CARE WHO DOCUMENTED THE COMPLETE STORY,CONTACTED WYATT VIA EMAIL TO AGAIN. HOWEVER, WYATT REFUSED. APPARENTLY BECAUSE I HAVE CHOSEN IN THE PAST TO HAVE A PERSONAL MECHANIC SERVICE MY CAR, CHANGE THE OIL AND TIRES, ETC. I AM CONSIDERED TO BE A "DISLOYAL VOLVO CUSTOMER" AND THIS WAS A CONSIDERATION IN WYATT'S DECISION NOT TO PAY FOR MY TRANSMISSION, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A DEFECTIVE PART. AT THIS POINT, I HAD TO HAVE MY CAR BACK, AND TOLD CARLSEN TO REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION. CARLSEN OFFERED A 10% DISCOUNT OFF THE TOTAL PRICE. A VERY KIND GESTURE, HOWEVER, I HAD TO PAY $4,600 OUT OF POCKET FOR ANOTHER NEW TRANSMISSION FOR THIS CAR. IT'S WELL DOCUMENTED THAT THE 1ST AND 2ND GENERATION TRANSMISSIONS FOR THIS MODEL HAVE BEEN DEFECTIVE. I AM DISGUSTED. *LN
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10378055January 20, 2011WHEELS
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 VOLVO XC90. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO HAVE THE TIRES REPLACED. THE FRONT RIGHT TIRE WAS REPLACED AND AIR CAME OUT OF THE TIRE. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THERE WAS A CRACK IN THE RIM WHICH CAUSED THE TIRE TO LOSE AIR. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE RIM WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 48,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10376565January 13, 2011ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 VOLVO XC90. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE SHUT OFF AND BACK ON CAUSING A PAINFUL JERKING MOTION TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT HURT HIS NECK AND SHOULDERS FROM THE DRASTIC JOLT THAT THE VEHICLE MADE. THE LIGHTS AND ALL POWER SHUT OFF AND THEN THEY IMMEDIATELY COME BACK ON. THE CONTACT HAD TAKEN THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER SEVERAL TIMES AND WAS TOLD THAT THEY COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE FAILURE SEEMED TO HAPPEN EVERY 500 MILES AND WAS NOW HAPPENING MORE FREQUENTLY. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,000 AND THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 119,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 1
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10373782January 2, 2011AIR BAGS:FRONTAL
MY HUSBAND HAD A 55MPH CRASH IN MY 2004 VOLVO XC90 ON THE FREEWAY. HE REAR ENDED ANOTHER DRIVER AT TOP SPEED, WAS SPUN AROUND SEVERAL TIMES ON THE FREEWAY AND ENDED UP FACING TRAFFIC. THE PASSENGER SIDE AIRBAG DEPLOYED, BUT THE DRIVER'S SIDE DID NOT. THE INSPECTOR FROM MY INSURANCE COMPANY SAID THERE WAS NOT REASON THE DRIVER'S SIDE AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY AT THAT SPEED, OTHER THAN A DEFECT, AS FAR AS HE WAS CONCERNED. I CONTACTED VOLVO AND WAS BASICALLY GIVEN THE RUN AROUND ABOUT HOW THE AIRBAG SHOULD NOT HAVE DEPLOYED AND THAT THIS WAS PERFECTLY OKAY. I WOULD LIKE AN INVESTIGATION ESPECIALLY SINCE MY CEM SYSTEM WAS NOT OPERATING PROPERLY PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. I HAD AIRBAG WARNING, BRAKE FAILURE, ETC., AND THE DEALER TOLD ME A YEAR AGO THE CEM SYSTEM WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY AND NEEDED TO BE REPAIRED AT $1300, WHICH I WAS NOT WILLING TO PAY. *TR
- Crash:
- Yes
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 1
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10372343December 24, 2010ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
DURING LONG DURATIONS(>4HRS) OF DRIVING MY 2004 VOLVO XC90, IT SEEMS TO HAVE ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS THAT HAVE CAUSED ME AND THE PASSENGERS TO BE PUT INTO DANGEROUS SITUATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, DRIVING ON A LONG TRIP WITH THE CRUISE CONTROL ENABLED AND TRYING TO ACCELERATE UP A HILL AND SUDDENLY THE CAR WILL GO INTO AN ENGINE PROTECTION MODE AND REDUCE POWER TO THE EXTENT THAT I CAN'T ACCELERATE AND HAVE TO PULL OVER ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD--(BOOST CONTROL MODULE HAS BEEN REPLACED AND THE ENGINE CONTROL MODULE HAS BEEN REPLACED.) AS LONG AS I DON'T USE THE CRUISE CONTROL THIS WILL NOT OCCUR. ALSO, THERE WAS A SOFTWARE UPDATE IN 2009. NEXT, AFTER TRYING TO ACCELERATE UP A HILL, THERE SEEMS TO BE INTERMITTENT REDUCTION IN ENGINE POWER, NOT ALLOWING THE CAR TO ACCELERATE. AFTER TRYING TO ACCELERATE THE "CHECK ENGINE" LIGHT HAS APPEARED AND WILL NOT GO OFF (WAITING TO HAVE THIS PROBLEM DIAGNOSED)... *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10371215December 19, 2010POWER TRAIN
2004 VOLVO XC 90 T6 TRANSMISSION. PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE NEW FROM DEALER. @ 35,000 THE TRANSMISSION FAILED. PRIOR TO THE FAILURE TRANSMISSION BEGAN TO SLIP AND THE VEHICLE WAS NON RESPONSIVE. DUE TO THE DELAY OF THE TRANSMISSION CATCHING AND PROPELLING THE VEHICLE FORWARD WE WERE IN A NEAR COLLISION WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. UNIT WAS REPLACED WITH A REFURBISHED ONE FROM THE DEALER. @ 85,000 THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO SHOW SYMPTOMS OF TRANSMISSION FAILURE AGAIN. THIS TIME IT WAS CORRECTED WITH A SOFTWARE UPDATE. NOW VEHICLE HAS 125,000 MILES AND TRANSMISSION FAILURE AGAIN. VEHICLE SHOWED NO SIGNS OF TRANSMISSION WEAR AND TEAR. JUST ALL OF THE SUDDEN VEHICLE CAME NON RESPONSIVE TO DRIVERS GAS INPUTS. THIS COULD BE A HUGE HAZARD IN HIGH TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN SERIOUS INJURIES AND EVEN DEATH. VOLVO REFUSES TO RECALL THIS UNITS. THEY ONLY OFFERED TO COVER 50% OF THE COST TO REPAIR. VOLVO KNOWS THAT THESE VEHICLES ARE PRONE TO PREMATURE TRANSMISSION FAILURE AND SHOULD RECALL AND REPLACE THIS UNITS AT NO COST TO THE CONSUMER. A QUICK INTER NET SEARCH AND YOU WILL FIND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LIKE ME EXPERIENCING TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS ON THESE VEHICLES. HTTP://TOWNHALL-TALK.EDMUNDS.COM/DIRECT/VIEW/.F18A651/ HTTP://WWW.MATTHEWSVOLVOSITE.COM/2009/03/TRANSMISSION-PROBLEMS/ HTTP://VOLVOFORUMS.COM/FORUM/SHOWTHREAD.PHP?T=7573&PAGE=2 SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE BEFORE SOMEONE GETS HURT. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10371394December 14, 2010ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, POWER TRAIN
A RUBBING NOISE BEGAN IN LATE SEPTEMBER. I HAD AN INSPECTION AND DIAGNOSTIC AT THE DEALERSHIP ON SEPTEMBER 23RD. THEY TOLD ME THE FRONT BEARINGS AND THE LOWER ENGINE MOUNT PAD SHOULD BE REPLACED. THE NEXT DAY, WHILE I WAS DRIVING, THE TRANSMISSION SEIZED. THE CAR WAS TOWED AND THE DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD TO REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION AND ENTIRE COOLANT SYSTEM. THEIR DIAGNOSTIC SPECIALIST WAS UNABLE TO DETECT SUCH A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE THE DAY BEFORE IT HAPPENED. WHO KNOWS WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY. VOLVO ACKNOWLEDGED THE PROBLEM BUT ONLY PAID FOR HALF OF THE PARTS AND LABOR. I STILL HAD TO COME OUT OF POCKET $3000+.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10370643December 14, 2010POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION FAILURE REQUIRING COMPLETE REPLACEMENT OF TRANSMISSION (NO REBUILD), RADIATOR AND TRANSMISSION COOLER. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10368947December 1, 2010ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
AT 65MPH ON A HIGHWAY, THE VEHICLE REGISTERED A "ANTI-SKID SERVICE REQUIRED" FAULT MESSAGE, THEN AN "ELECTRICAL SERVICE REQUIRED" MESSAGE. THE ENGINE THEN QUIT RUNNING, THE STEERING BECAME UNRESPONSIVE AND THE VEHICLE IMMEDIATELY STARTED DECELERATING. THE BRAKING WAS VERY MUSHY AND THE CAR WAS DIFFICULT TO PULL OVER AND STOP. THE CAR WOULD NOT START. ALL THE LIGHTS AND THE BATTERY SEEM TO BE WORKING FINE. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THE CEM (ENGINE CONTROL MODULE) WAS DEFECTIVE AND NEEDS REPLACEMENT.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10366551November 17, 2010ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 VOLVO XC90. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH, EVERY ELECTRICAL COMPONENT MALFUNCTIONED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHO STATED THAT THE STEREO SYSTEM NEEDED TO BE REPLACED; THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. TWO DAYS AFTER THE REPAIR, THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONED AGAIN. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN INSPECTED OR REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 132,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10366489November 16, 2010FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
MY VEHICLE WAS RECALLED FOR A FUEL PUMP ISSUE BY THE NHTSA. IN A LETTER DATED 9/13/2010, VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA OUTLINED THE REASON FOR THE RECALL AND SPECIFICALLY ADVISED: PLEASE SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT AT YOUR LOCAL AUTHORIZED VOLVO RETAILER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO HAVE THIS IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALL PERFORMED AT NO CHARGE. I CONTACTED MY VOLVO RETAILER AND WAS SPECIFICALLY ADVISED TO BRING MY CAR IN WITH AS LITTLE FUEL AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE THE TECHNICIANS WOULD HAVE TO DRAIN THE TANKS TO CONDUCT THE REPAIR. I FOLLOWED THIS ORDER TO THE LETTER AND DROPPED MY VEHICLE OFF FOR THE "NO CHARGE" RECALL REPAIR. AT DROP OFF, I HAD ALSO SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT TO CONTACT ME WITH AN ESTIMATE FOR A REPAIR TO THE THIRD ROW SEAT AND RIGHT TURN SIGNAL BEFORE CORRECTING. THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT DID CALL WITH THE ESTIMATE FOR THE SEAT REPAIR AND I AGREED TO THE $100 CHARGE. IN THE AFTERNOON WHEN MY HUSBAND PICKED UP MY VOLVO, I HAD BEEN CHARGED $53.72 FOR FUEL THAT I NEVER AUTHORIZED. WHEN I CALLED TO COMPLAIN, I WAS TOLD THE VEHICLE HAD TO BE FUELED IN ORDER TO CHECK THE REPAIR. IF THAT WAS THE CASE, THEN WHY WAS I TOLD TO BRING IT IN EMPTY AND NEVER TOLD THAT VOLVO WOULD TAKE THE LIBERTY TO FILL IT UP WITHOUT MY APPROVAL? $54 DOLLARS IS NOT THE ISSUE--THE ISSUE IS THAT VOLVO WANTED TO MAKE AN EASY REPAIR WITH A CAR THEY DID NOT HAVE TO DRAIN GAS FROM THE TANK AND STORE. I COULD HAVE BROUGHT MY CAR IN WITH A FULL TANK AND IT WAS VOLVO'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR MY CAR "AT NO CHARGE". INSTEAD, VOLVO SHIFTED THEIR BURDEN TO ME AND THEN MADE ME PAY TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR THEIR REPAIR TECHNICIANS. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10365255November 10, 2010EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 VOLVO XC90. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE OWNER'S MANUAL PROVIDED INACCURATE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE TOWING CAPACITY; HOWEVER, THE 2005 AND 2006 OWNER'S MANUAL SPECIFIED THE ACCURATE WEIGHT REDUCTION WITH THE VEHICLE OCCUPANTS. IN ADDITION, THE ENTIRE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM BECAME INOPERATIVE INTERMITTENTLY. THE RELAY SWITCH, INTERNAL REM AND YAW MODULES WERE REPLACED AT DIFFERENT TIMES. WHILE DRIVING THE ENGINE WOULD COMPLETELY SHUT OFF WHEN THE CONTACTS KNEE WAS CLOSE TO THE IGNITION KEY. THE FAILURE CONTINUED AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. CURRENTLY, DIAGNOSTIC TESTING WAS BEING PERFORMED BY THE DEALER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 10,000.
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10364361November 7, 2010ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEMS WITH MOST RECENT BEING A SHUTDOWN EVERYTHING ELECTRICAL ON THE DASHBOARD. CAR WOULD STILL DRIVE BUT NO INSTRUMENTATION, DOOR LOCKS, WINDOWS OR ABILITY TO OPEN GAS TANK COVER FROM BUTTON INSIDE CAR. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10364365November 7, 2010EQUIPMENT
SWIVEL AND SPRING ON REMOTE CONTROL STOP WORKING. THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM FOR US, BEGINNING LESS THAN 1 YEAR AFTER WE PURCHASED CAR NEW. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED SWIVELS ON REMOTE AND UPGRADED SWIVELS ON REMOTES. AFTER SEVERAL TIMES THEY TOLD US THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE THEY COULD DO. HAVE SINCE CHANGED THE ENGINEERING BUT NOW, PROBABLY DUE TO THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE REMOTE FELL ON GROUND BECAUSE OF FAULTY SWIVELS, THE SPRING FOR THE ACTUAL KEY DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE AND REMOTE WILL TILT DOWN SOMETIMES WHILE DRIVING SO MY WIFE AND 16 YEAR OLD SON HAVE BOTH HAD THEIR KNEES HIT IT AND TURNED THE CAR OFF WHILE DRIVING IT. THANK GOD THEY DID NOT HAVE AN ACCIDENT. WENT TO VOLVO AND THEY SAID THIS IS A WEAR AND TEAR ITEM AND THEY WANT $400 TO REPLACE 1. INSPITE OF FACT THEY HAVE TRIED TO FIX THIS MULTIPLE TIMES AND INSPITE OF THE FACT THEY NEVER WERE ABLE TO MAKE IT WORK PROPERLY THEY WILL NOT STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT. NOW IT IS DANGEROUS. I AM SHOCKED A CAR TOUTED AS "SAFE" LIKE THIS ONE WOULD HAVE THIS KIND OF PROBLEM AND THEY WOULD NOT FIX IT! *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10361699October 22, 2010ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
2004 VOLVO XC 90 , 2.5 AWD. WHILE DRIVING ON I40 AT NIGHT ,(65 MPH, IN DRIVE) A LOUD THUMP FOLLOWED BY MOMENTARY ELECTRICAL FAILURE( HEADLIGHTS, LOSS OF ENGINE POWER.) IT THEN PICKED BACK UP AND CONTINUED ON FOR APPROX 1/4 MILE AND IT HAPPENED AGAIN. MADE INTO FAR RIGHT LANE FROM THE 3RD LANE OVER. OTHER THAN THE RADIO VOLUME EVERYTHING WORKED AS NORMAL THE NEXT 40 MILES TO HOME. THIS HAPPENED AT APPROX. 9:30 PM IN THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERSTATE . WHAT IF THE LIGHTS HAD FAILED AND IT NOT REGAINED POWER, 40/85 IS A BUSY HIGHWAY AT NIGHT. I WAS DRIVING WITH MY WIFE AND 2 KIDS. *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0
- #10361590October 21, 2010ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
I HAVE A 2004 VOLVO XC90 THAT NEEDS THE CEM REPLACED A COST OF $1400.00. AS I WAS DOING RESEARCH ON MY CARS PROBLEM I NOTICED THAT ALMOST EVERY MODEL OF VOLVO HAS THE SAME ISSUE. THE CEM IS THE COMPUTER THAT CONTROLS EVERYTHING. WHEN MINE WENT BAD I WAS DRIVING 70MPH DOWN THE INTERSTATE AND THE CAR JUST SHUT OFF. VERY DANGEROUS!!!!! *TR
- Crash:
- No
- Fire:
- No
- Injuries:
- 0
- Deaths:
- 0