Toyota Prius Complaints (2005)

1,051 consumer complaints on file.

#10246818October 27, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
OUR 2005 PRIUS RECENTLY DEVELOPED A PROBLEM WITH THE AUTOMATIC-LEVELING HEADLIGHTS. WARNING SYMBOLS APPEARED ON THE DASH. AS WE WERE DRIVING, WE NOTICED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS WERE AIMED MUCH HIGHER THAN USUAL, SO THAT THE LOW BEAMS APPEARED MORE LIKE HIGH BEAMS. IN THE COURSE OF THIS TRIP, WE STOPPED BRIEFLY AND TURNED OFF THE CAR. WHEN WE RESUMED OUR TRIP, WE NOTICED THE HEADLIGHTS WERE NOW VERY LOW, SO LOW THAT WE DARED NOT GO OVER ABOUT 20 MPH. WE SCHEDULED A VISIT TO OUR TOYOTA SERVICE DEPARTMENT; BUT WHILE THE WARNING LIGHTS WERE STILL ON, THE HEADLIGHTS WERE NOW AIMED NORMALLY. PRIOR TO THIS SERVICE VISIT, AN INTERNET SEARCH REVEALED THAT A NUMBER OF 2004-2005 PRIUSES HAVE EXPERIENCED A PROBLEM WITH THE SENSOR IN THE REAR OF THE CAR, IN THE VICINITY OF THE LEFT REAR TIRE WELL, THAT MEASURES THE LOAD ON THE REAR END AND ADJUSTS THE HEADLIGHTS ACCORDINGLY. TOYOTA HAS PUBLISHED A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN ON THE PROBLEM. IT APPEARS THAT IN A NUMBER OF PRIUSES, THE SENSOR IS DEFECTIVE, BUT THE PROBLEM IS INTERMITTENT AND DIFFICULT TO DETECT. I SHARED WITH THE DEALER WHAT I KNEW ABOUT THE PROBLEM, E-MAILED (AT THEIR REQUEST) THE TSB, AND ASKED THAT EVEN THOUGH OUR CAR WAS RECENTLY OUT OF WARRANTY, SINCE IT HAD ONLY 25,000 MILES ON IT AND THE PROBLEM WAS CLEARLY A SYSTEMATIC MANUFACTURING DEFECT AS WELL AS A POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD, THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD REMEDY THE PROBLEM AT NO CHARGE. DURING MY DISCUSSION WITH THE SERVICE ADVISER, HE ADMITTED THAT WHILE NO FAULT CODE COULD BE DETECTED, THE ONLY POSSIBLE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM HAD TO BE THE SENSOR. THE SERVICE ADVISOR SAID THERE WAS NO WAY TOYOTA WOULD COVER THE REPAIR; THAT ALREADY IN THE PAST MONTH, 15 OF THESE UNITS HAD TO BE REPLACED IN THE REGION AND NONE OF THEM HAD BEEN COVERED BY WARRANTY. HOWEVER, THE SERVICE ADVISOR INDICATED THE DEALERSHIP ITSELF WOULD COVER THE PART ($470) IF I AGREED TO PAY FOR THE INSTALLATION ($200). I DID SO AND THE PROBLEM HAS NOW BEEN REMEDIED. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10245392October 14, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
2005 TOYOTA PRIUS...PURCHASED NEW...HAVE HAD NINE (9) EXTERIOR LIGHTS BURN OUT. I HAVE REPLACED THEM AND THEY SEEM TO BE WORKING BETTER. I BELIEVE THE BULBS USED BY TOYOTA WERE INFERIOR. AFTER 36,000 MILES TOYOTA WOULD NOT REPLACE ANY BULBS. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10245469October 14, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
2005 TOYOTA PRIUS HEADLIGHTS GO OFF SPONTANEOUSLY. USUALLY JUST THE DRIVERS SIDE BUT RECENTLY BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. BEFORE TURNING THE LIGHTS OFF AND BACK ON WOULD FIX IT BUT NOW IT DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK. PREVIOUS OWNER HAD IT CHECKED BY TOYOTA BUT THEY COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10244631October 7, 2008
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS. FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS, THE VEHICLE HAS EMITTED AN ODOR INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT, WHICH STICKS TO THE CONTACT'S CLOTHING AND HAIR. THE ODOR HAS BEEN RECOGNIZED BY TOYOTA AS AN ODOR THAT ORIGINATES FROM THE REAR BATTERY WHICH IS FOUND UNDER THE BACK SEAT. THE ODOR IS TRIGGERED BY EXTREME HEAT AND WHILE PULLING HEAVY LOADS. THE CONTACT LIVES IN ARIZONA SO THE VEHICLE IS SUBJECTED TO EXTREME HEAT. TOYOTA STATED THAT THE ODOR WAS NON-TOXIC AND THAT THERE WAS NO CURRENT REMEDY FOR THE DEFECT. THE CONTACT BELIEVES THAT THE CHEMICAL MAY BE TOXIC AND FEELS UNCOMFORTABLE DRIVING THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 13,000 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 45,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10242729September 17, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
DRIVER'S SIDE HEADLIGHT BEGAN GOING OUT INTERMITTENTLY, FIRST RARELY, THEN GRADUALLY MORE FREQUENTLY. SWITCHING THEM OFF AND ON WOULD RESTORE IT TEMPORARILY. THE FIRST TIME I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER THEY COULDN'T REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM. BY THE TIME IT BECAME VERY BAD, THEY DIAGNOSED THAT THE HEADLAMP WAS OVERHEATING, AND REPLACED IT ($360). NOW, LESS THAN TWO MONTHS LATER IT HAS STARTED GOING OUT AGAIN, AT INFREQUENT INTERVALS. THIS IS CLEARLY A SAFETY ISSUE AND NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10240782September 3, 2008
AIR BAGS
INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT, HIT BROADSIDED ON DRIVER'S SIDE AND RAMMED INTO GUARD RAIL ON FRONT OF VEHICLE, THE FRONT WINDSHIELD WAS BROKEN AND PART OF THE DOOR HAD TO BE REMOVED TO GET ME OUT.. THE CAR WAS A 2005 PRIUS WITH SIDE, CURTAIN, AND FRONT AIRBAGS, NONE OF WHICH DEPLOYED. THE CAR WAS TOTALED. I SUFFERED NECK, BACK AND SHOULDER TRAMA AND HAVE NOT BE ABLE TO WORK FOR A MONTH AND HALF. *TR
Crash:
Yes
Fire:
No
Injuries:
1
Deaths:
0
#10240237August 29, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
WE NOTICED SHORTLY AFTER WE BOUGHT OUR 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS THAT THE HEADLIGHTS DID NOT SHINE FAR ENOUGH IN ADVANCE OF THE CAR TO PROPERLY ILLUMINATE THE ROAD. WHEN WE COMPLAINED TO THE DEALER, THEY CHECKED IT AND SAID THAT THE LIGHTS WERE SET PROPERLY SO AS NOT TO SHINE IN THE FACE OF APPROACHING CAR. NOW THE AUTOMATIC SENSOR WARNING LIGHT WARNING OF A PROBLEM ILLUMINATES AND INDICATES HEADLIGHT PROBLEMS ANY TIME WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE BACK SEAT OF THE CAR. DESPITE HAVING HIGH INTENSITY HEADLIGHTS OFFERED IN THIS PACKAGE (PACKAGE 4), WE STILL DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THIS CAR AT NIGHT BECAUSE THE HEADLIGHTS ILLUMINATE ONLY ABOUT 15-20 FEET IN FRONT OF THE CAR, EVEN AT 'HIGH BEAMS.' I DON'T WANT TO BLIND SOMEONE, BUT I DO WANT TO SEE THE ROAD MORE THAN 20 FEET IN FRONT OF ME. I AM INDICATING THE PROBLEM BEGAN IN MAY, 2008 BECAUSE THAT'S WHEN THE SENSOR WARNING LIGHT STARTED TO COME ON, BUT THIS HAS BEEN A PROBLEM WITH THIS CAR PRETTY MUCH EVER SINCE WE BOUGHT IT. THE DEALER SAYS THERE IS A BULLETIN OUT ABOUT IT, BUT WANTS TO CHARGE US ABOUT $500 TO FIX IT SINCE IT IS 8,000 MILES PAST WARRANTY. HAD I KNOWN THAT OTHERS HAVE IDENTIFIED THIS AS A PROBLEM (WWW.PRIUSCHAT.COM), I WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE INSISTENT BEFORE THE WARRANTY RAN OUT. THIS CAR REALLY IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY HERE IN RURAL MAINE WHERE WE HAVE MANY LARGE ANIMALS ON THE HIGHWAYS AT NIGHT (INCLUDING MOOSE). *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10239083August 20, 2008
TIRES
I PURCHASED A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS AND DROVE IT FOR 12,00 MILES AT WHICH TIME THE TIRES WERE COMPLETELY WORE OUT. WHEN I WENT IN TO TOYOTA AND POINTED THIS OUT THEY REPLACED THE TIRES BECAUSE THE CAR WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY. I TAKE MY CAR IN FOR THE SCHEDULED SERVICES RECOMMENDED BY TOYOTA. TO DATE MY CAR HAS 25,000 MILES AND I AM EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEMS WITH THE TIRES. THEREFORE THE TIRES ONLY HAVE 13,000 MILES WEAR. I CALLED TOYOTA AND SPOKE TO THE HEAD MANAGER WHO INDICATED THAT THE PRIUS CARS HAVE THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE BATTERY AND TOYOTA IS AWARE OF THIS. IF THEY ARE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM, WHY DO THEY USE THE GOODYEAR TIRES WHICH WEAR OUT SO QUICKLY? I HAVE ALSO READ ON THE INTERNET OF OTHER PRIUS OWNERS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM WITH THE TIRES AND HAVING BLOW OUTS ON FREEWAYS, ETC. I THINK THERE SHOULD BE A SAFETY RECALL ON TOYOTA PRIUS TIRES SINCE UPON READING INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET THERE HAVE BEEN A MULTITUDE OF OWNERS WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE THE SAME PROBLEM AS I. THEY SHOULD PUT SAFER TIRES ON THE CAR SINCE THEY ARE AWARE OF THIS SITUATION. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10238412August 15, 2008
AIR BAGS
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 45 MPH, THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE CRASHED WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE IMPACT CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO TURN OVER ONTO THE DRIVER'S SIDE AND SKID ACROSS THE SHOULDER INTO THE GRASS. THE VEHICLE WENT AIRBORNE DOWN AN EMBANKMENT AND CONTINUED TO ROLL. THE VELOCITY WAS DECREASED BY A BARB WIRE FENCE CATCHING ONTO THE TIRE OF THE VEHICLE, WHICH CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO LAND ON ITS TIRES. THE PASSENGER SIDE B-BEAM WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED. NONE OF THE EIGHT AIR BAGS DEPLOYED. THE VEHICLE WAS COMPLETELY DESTROYED AND A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE DRIVER SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT INSPECTED THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 55,000.
Crash:
Yes
Fire:
No
Injuries:
1
Deaths:
0
#10237948August 13, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
HEADLIGHTS BEGAN ILLUMINATING VERY SHORT DISTANCE. REPAIR CENTER FOUND FAILED SENSOR. MY CONCERN IS THAT SYSTEM FAILED INTO UNSAFE CONDITION WHEN THE ONBOARD SYSTEMS ARE PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF REMEMBERING THE LAST SAFE CONDITION. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10237009August 5, 2008
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING 25 MPH, THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL VERY HARD TO AVOID CRASHING INTO THE PRECEDING VEHICLE. THE BRAKES DID NOT RESPOND WHEN THEY WERE APPLIED, WHICH CAUSED THE CONTACT TO REAR END THE VEHICLE ANYWAY. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND THE CONTACT DID NOT NOTICE ANY PRIOR WARNINGS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 16,000.
Crash:
Yes
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10236866August 4, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
MY 2005 PRIUS STARTED TO INTERMITTENTLY DISPLAY A WARNING TRIANGLE SIGN ON THE DASHBOARD. FINALLY IT CAME ON AND STAYED ON. THE DEALER PERFORMED A DIAGNOSTIC CHECK AND SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE HEADLIGHT LEVELING SYSTEM - A SHORT OR SOME SUCH GLITCH. COST TO REPAIR $700. I DECLINED TO REPAIR SINCE IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE OTHER PRIUS PROBLEMS WITH HEADLIGHTS. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10236673August 1, 2008
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
TOYOTA'S HID HEADLIGHTS SEEM TO ONLY WORK INTERMITTENTLY. TOYOTA WOULD LIKE US TO REPLACE THE BULBS. LABOR AND THE BULB RUN ABOUT $500. THIS SEEMS TO BE A PROBLEM WITH MANY OF TOYOTA'S VEHICLES AND SEEMS LIKE CONSUMER GOUGING ON A FAULTY PRODUCT/DESIGN TO THE NTH DEGREE! *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10235664July 24, 2008
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
I OWN A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS. I PURCHASED IT IN MARCH 2005. LAST WEEK, MY MULTIFUNCTIONAL DISPLAY (MFD) CEASED TO OPERATE CORRECTLY. THE MFD INITIALIZED TO THE MPG SCREEN BUT HAD UNUSUAL COLORS. I ATTEMPTED TO CHANGE THE DISPLAY SCREEN BY SELECTING THE AUDIO, CLIMATE, DISPLAY, AND INFO BUTTONS BUT TO NO AVAIL. THE SCREEN WOULD GO BLANK AND THEN SHOW THE ?PRIUS HYBRID? INITIALIZING SCREEN AND THEN RETURN TO THE MPG SCREEN. AS I WAS NEARING MY 80K SERVICE, I CONTACTED MY DEALER AND REPORTED THE PROBLEM. THEY DIAGNOSED THE MFD AS BEING UNSERVICEABLE THAT NEXT SATURDAY. THE SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE MADE THE COMMENT THAT IT WAS COMMON FOR THE MFD TO GO BAD. TO REPLACE THE MFD WITH A NEW ONE, IT IS $4,000.00 PLUS INSTALLATION. THAT IS 19% OF THE COST OF THE VEHICLE WHEN IT WAS BRAND NEW! I BEGAN RESEARCHING AND FOUND THAT TOYOTA HAD ISSUED A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN ON 10 JANUARY 2005 TITLE: MULTI-DISPLAY FUNCTIONS ARE INOPERATIVE; TSB# EL002-05 WHICH IDENTIFIED ISSUES WITH THE MFD. ALSO IN BROWSING THE WEB SPECIFICALLY WWW.PRIUSCHAT.COM AND HTTP://AUTOS.GROUPS.YAHOO.COM/GROUP/PRIUS-2G/ AND SAW THAT I WAS NOT THE ONLY ONE WITH THIS PROBLEM. ONE ELECTRONICALLY GIFTED PERSON DISASSEMBLED HIS MFD AND DIAGNOSED THE PROBLEM AS IMPROPER SOLDERING ON THE CIRCUIT CARD (SEE HTTP://TECHNO-FANDOM.ORG/~HOBBIT/CARS/MFD/COMPARE.HTML ). IT SEEMS THAT TOYOTA CORPORATION WAS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM AND WERE NOT DISCLOSING IT HOPING THAT THE FAULTY MFD?S WOULD NOT BE DISCOVERED UNTIL THE VEHICLES EXCEEDED THE 3 YEAR 36,000 WARRANTY. I KNOW I AM OUTSIDE THE MILEAGE WARRANTY, HOWEVER, I AM JUST PASSED THE 3 YEAR WINDOW. I PURCHASED AND USE MY CAR AS A COMMUTER VEHICLE DRIVING ALMOST 100 MILES PER DAY. AS A MAINTENANCE OFFICER IN THE US ARMY, I KNOW THERE ARE COMPONENTS THAT ARE MILEAGE DEPENDENT (ENGINES, TRANSMISSIONS, DIFFERENTIALS) BUT THIS IS NOT ONE OF THEM. ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ARE BUILT TO LAST THE MAJORITY OF VEHICLES LIFE, NOT JUST UNTIL THE WARRANTY EXPIRES. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10234837July 18, 2008
SUSPENSION, SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE BEGAN MAKING UNFAMILIAR NOISES WHILE PARKED. WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH, THE NOISE CONTINUED IN INTERVALS. THE SERVICE BRAKE AND THE ABS WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THE BRAKE ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY (PART NUMBER 4450047090) NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $2,600. THE YEAR BEFORE, THE BRAKE ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY WAS REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY BY AN AUTHORIZED TOYOTA DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER CONFIRMED THAT THE PART WAS PREVIOUSLY REPLACED IN MAY OF 2007. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 18,799 AND CURRENT MILEAGE IS 32,016. UPDATED 10-07-08 *BF THE TIRE SHOWED UNUSUAL WEAR PATTERNS. THE VEHICLE PULLED TO THE RIGHT. UPDATED 10/07/08. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10234424July 15, 2008
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE BEHIND HIM NOTICED A PIECE OF PLASTIC HANGING UNDERNEATH THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER AND THEY REPLACED THE PLASTIC COVER ON CABLES THAT EXTENDED FROM THE FRONT TO THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 46,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 45,950. UPDATED 09/16/08. *LJ THE COSUMER STATED THE PLASTIC COVER BROKE DUE TO REOAD DEBRIS. UPDATED 09/18/08. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10233825July 10, 2008
SERVICE BRAKES, ELECTRIC
TOYOTA PRIUS 2005 FAILING BRAKE SYSTEM- FOR THE SECOND TIME (THE FIRST INCIDENT WAS ON 27-JUN-2008) MY BRAKES WERE NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. THE FIRST TIME THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP "RECALIBRATED THE COMPUTER" AND COULD NOT TELL ME WHY IS FAILED OR THAT IT WOULD NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. THE SECOND OCCASION, YESTERDAY, I ACTUALLY REARENDED ANOTHER CAR. NO DAMAGE OTHER THAN A COMPLAINT OF POSSIBLE WHIPLASH AND A WARNING THAT I MAY HEAR FROM HIM IN A FEW DAYS. THE DEALER JUST CALLED ME THIS AFTERNOON TO TELL ME THAT NOW THEY ARE "REPLACING THE COMPUTER." DOES THIS HAPPEN TO PRIUS'S. IT WAS VERY FRIGHTENING AND REALLY MAKES ME FEEL QUITE UNSAFE TO DRIVE MY CAR WHICH PRESENTED NO MAJOR PROBLEMS UNTIL THE PRESENT BRAKING ISSUE. THE ANTI SKID LIGHT COMES ON A FAIR AMOUNT AND MY TIRES SLIP. I HAVE BEEN ON LINE AND THERE SEEMS TO BE A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS SIMILAR TO MINE AND IN DIFFERENT MODEL YEARS. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10233200July 4, 2008
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL, AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW
I WAS INVOLVED IN A OFF-SET FRONTAL COLLISION IN A 2005 TOYOTA PRIUS EQUIPPED WITH DUAL FRONT AIR BAGS AND SIDE CURTAIN AIR BAGS ON JULY 1, 2008. NONE OF THE FOUR AIR BAG SYSTEMS IN THIS VEHICLE DEPLOYED UPON IMPACT. I WAS TRAVELING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH AND THE OTHER VEHICLE WAS GOING ~ 30-35 MPH. THE OTHER DRIVER INVOLVED WAS NOT INJURED, BUT I WAS TAKEN BY AMBULANCE TO THE LOCAL ER TRAUMA CENTER WHERE I UNDERWENT OVER 11 HOURS IN A NECK COLLAR AND NUMEROUS CT SCANS, MRIS AND SEVERAL X-RAYS. THANKFULLY I WAS NOT SERIOUSLY INJURED BUT STILL HAVE NECK, BACK, AND ABDOMINAL PAIN FROM THE CRASH. PRIOR TO THIS ACCIDENT, I HAD SURGERY ON JUNE 24, 2008 AND WAS STILL RECOVERING FROM THE SURGERY. THE AUTO ACCIDENT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED THE SPEED OF MY RECOVERY. *TR
Crash:
Yes
Fire:
No
Injuries:
1
Deaths:
0
#10231486June 18, 2008
EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER
UNPROTECTED A/C CONDENSER ON TOYOTA PRIUS VERY VULNERABLE TO MINOR ROAD DEBRIS ALLOWING ESCAPE OF POTENTIALLY HARMFUL TO THE ENVIRONMENT AC FLUID. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10230229June 7, 2008
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
FIVE NO STARTING CONCERNS AFTER TWO YEARS OF OWNERSHIP. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0

← Back to Toyota Prius