Acura MDX Complaints (2002)

205 consumer complaints on file.

#10174638November 29, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP
ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, ON EITHER WET OR DRY PAVEMENT, THE CAR FAILED TO STOP AND CONTINUED ON DANGEROUSLY INTO INTERSECTIONS. ONCE THE BRAKES WERE EITHER APPLIED OR PUMPED THE CAR CONTINUED TO SLIDE FOR AT LEAST 30 FEET WHEN GOING SLOWLY TO COME TO A STOP AT A STOP LIGHT. THE DEALER ON EACH OCCASION TOLD ME THAT THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE BRAKES. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10174033November 22, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION HARD DOWNSHIFT FROM 3RD TO 2ND GEAR. FLUID JET KIT (RECALL ACTION) HAS BEEN COMPLETED. DEALER STATES THIS IS NOT COVERED AND TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT IS NECESSARY. HAVE SEEN LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF OTHER SIMILAR COMPLAINTS ON ACURA MESSAGE BOARDS. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10172126October 30, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION FAILED ON FREEWAY. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10167040August 30, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:TORQUE CONVERTER
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE MADE A CLICKING NOISE AS IT ACCELERATED FROM 30-40 MPH. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THE TORK CONVERTER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10161291July 3, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
ACURA CLAIMED TO FIX MY TRANSMISSION, AS PER THE RECALLS THAT WERE MADE ON 2001-2002 ACURA MDX'S. THEY OBVIOUSLY DID NOT FIX WHAT THEY NEEDED TO. YESTERDAY AS I WAS DRIVING I NOTICED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WOULD SHIFT TO DIFFERENT GEARS ON ITS OWN!! FOR EXAMPLE I WOULD BE IN D5 A DRIVE GEAR. SOMETIMES IT WOULD SHIFT ITSELF TO NEUTRAL, AND SOMETIMES TO D4,3. THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AS IT CAN CAUSE ACCIDENTS IF THIS WERE TO HAPPEN AT INOPPORTUNE TIMES. I JUST GOT OFF THE PHONE WITH ACURA AND THEY SAID THAT THEY FIXED WHAT WAS NECESSARY TO BE FIXED WHEN I BROUGHT THE CAR IN 1-2 YEARS AGO. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE AND I FEEL THAT THE NHTSA SHOULD BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS POTENTIALLY FATAL ISSUE WITH THIS CAR. I WAS TOLD TO WAIT FOR A MANAGER TO COME BACK IN THIS WEDNESDAY JULY 5TH. MY ACURA DEALERSHIP IS LOCATED IN ROSLYN, NY; CALLED RALLYE ACURA. THIS CAR IS A P.O.S., AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS AGAINST ACURA FOR THIS CAR. I HAVE FOUND OUT THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS DESIGN FLAWS IN THE 2001-2002 MDX TRANSMISSIONS. PLEASE HELP TO FORCE ACURA TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE AS THEY ARE NOT BEING COOPERATIVE NOR CAREFUL, WHICH I FEEL IS OUTRAGEOUS DUE TO THE DANGEROUS NATURE OF THIS TRANSMISSION ISSUE. ALSO, I DO NOT WANT A "REFURBISHED OR REBUILT" TRANSMISSION WHICH I HAVE BEEN INFORMED IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING. OBVIOUSLY WHATEVER THEY ARE DOING IS NOT WORKING. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10160051June 16, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
FROM THIRD GEAR INTO FOURTH GEAR, THE TRANSMISSION SLIPS, IT DISENGAGES LIKE IF IT'S IN NEUTRAL FOR JUST A FEW SECONDS, AND THEN GOES INTO THE NEXT GEAR WITH A JERK. NOW IT SEEMS LIKE THAT IT'S ALWAYS JERKING. ABOUT A YEAR OR TWO AGO, I HAD A MUCH LESS NOTICEABLE LOSS OF POWER INCIDENT WITH THE VEHICLE WITH THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT COMING ON. THE DEALER CLEARED THE WARNING LIGHT AND ADVISED THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEMS. ON 06/16/06 I BROUGHT THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION FLUID, BUT THAT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. THEY ADVISED I WOULD NEED A NEW TRANSMISSION. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10158820June 2, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION FAILURE AT 64,600 MILES. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10157694May 17, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
MY MDX HAS 85K MILES ON IT, AND THE TRANNY STARTED THE INFAMOUS GOING INTO NEUTRAL AT 30-40 MPH ON AN INTERMITTENT BASIS...I'VE DONE ALL THE VARIOUS OIL SENDING UNIT AND EGR VALVE FIXES BUT STARTED HAVING THE ABOVE PROBLEM ABOUT 7K AGO, BUT WHEN I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER THEY GAVE THE OLD HMMM, IF WE CAN'T REPEAT IT, WE REALLY CAN'T REPLACE IT.... THEN, THE ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON. I MADE AN APPT WITH THE DEALER (PLEASANTON ACURA), THEY GAVE ME A $69 A DAY RENTAL AND SAID THEY WOULD CHECK IT OUT. THEY DID, AND CONFIRMED THE ENGINE CODE WAS TIED TO THE DEFECTIVE TRANSMISSION. I ONLY HAD THE STANDARD WARRANTY (50K, 4 YR) . I RECEIVED A CALL BACK THE SAME DAY SAYING ACURA HAS AGREED TO PAY FOR THE TRANSMISSION, BUT I WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE LABOR...$1,100. I THINK ACURA SHOULD HAVE TO ANNOUNCE AND SUPPORT A TOTAL RECALL. I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD SPEND $1,100 ON A TRANSMISSION FOR A 2002 ACURA MDX WITH AN OUT THE DOOR PRICE OF ~$47,000 - UNBELIEVABLE! I POSTED THE ABOVE ON THE ACURAMDX.ORG WEBSITE AFTER DOING A GOOGLE SEARCH ON MDX TRANSMISSIONS AND FINDING HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS FROM CAR OWNERS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, ALL HAVING THE SAME TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS ON 2002 MDX. APPARENTLY, ACURA EXTENDED THE TRANSMISSION WARRANTY ON THEIR 2002 TL'S WITH THE SAME TRANSMISSION PROBLEM BUT FOR SOME REASON HAVE AVOIDED ADDRESSING THE MDX WITH A FORMAL RECALL OR EXTENDED WARRANTY EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW AND THE PUBLIC ALL KNOW THE TRANSMISSION WAS A DEFECTIVE DESIGN AND REALLY POSES A SAFETY RISK FOR HUNDREDS OF MDX OWNERS AND OTHERS THAT MIGHT BE AFFECTED WHEN THE MDX TRANSMISSION FAILS TO ALLOW THE VEHICLE TO ACCELERATE WHEN MERGING ONTO A HIGHWAY WITH A SEMI-TRUCK THAT DOESN'T KNOW YOU'RE HAVING A TRANSMISSION FAILURE WHICH CAUSES YOUR TRANSMISSION TO SLIP AND LOSE ENGINE DRIVE POWER. THIS IS ONE BLATANT SAFETY ISSUE THAT ACURA SHOULD DO THE RIGHT THING AND EXTEND THE WARRANTY AND REPLACE THESE DEFECTIVE MDX 2002 TRANSMISSIONS. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10152039March 6, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
DRIVING AT APPROX. 40 MPG. DURING ACCELERATION THE CAR DID NOT RESPOND AND THEN LURCHED FORWARD. THE SECOND TIME THE CAR DID NOT RESPOND DURING ACCELERATION GOING UP A HILL AND I STARTED TO LOSE MOMENTUM. ENGINE LIGHT FINALLY CAME ON AFTER APPROX 10 SECONDS. I WAS STUCK ON THE ROAD WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO MOVE THE VEHICLE OFF THE ROAD. DEALER CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS TRANSMISSION FAILURE. NO HELP IN SUBSIDIZING FIX AS VEHICLE WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10151425February 28, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
2002 ACURA MDX AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FAILURE OCCURRED AT 77K MILES. SYMPTOMS INCLUDED UP-SHIFT HESITATION BETWEEN 2-3 DRIVE GEARS, HARD AND JERKY TRANSMISSION CHANGES IN BOTH DRIVE AND REVERSE. THE SYMPTOMS STARTED TO GET PROGRESSIVELY WORSE AND MORE FREQUENT. I TOOK THIS MDX TO A LOCAL AAA-APPROVED, INDEPENDENT AUTO REPAIR SHOP FOR A DIAGNOSIS. THE SHOP'S REPAIR TECHNICIAN AND A TRANSMISSIONS SPECIALIST TEST DROVE THE MDX AND EXPERIENCED THE SAME TYPE OF SYMPTOMS. THEY RETURNED AND REPORTED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS INDEED FAILING. I HAD THE MDX TOWED TO THE ACURA DEALERSHIP WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED. THE DEALERSHIP'S SERVICE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS FAILING AND IT HAD TO BE REPLACED COMPLETELY. THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED WITH A REBUILT UNIT BY THE ACURA SERVICE DEPARTMENT. A HISTORICAL NOTE: BACK IN THE FALL OF 2004, I RECEIVED NOTICE OF A MDX TRANSMISSION RECALL FROM ACURA. SHORTLY UPON RECEIVING THIS NOTICE I DID TAKE THIS MDX TO AN ACURA DEALERSHIP SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND HAD THE TRANSMISSION RECALL SERVICE DONE. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10151306February 27, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE TRANSMISSION IS FAILING ON THE VEHICLE. THERE IS AN NHTSA RECALL, #04V176000 CONCERNING THE POWER TRAIN: AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION; HOWEVER THE RECALL DID NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM. THE VEHICLE'S TRANSMISSION WAS NOT FAILING AT THE TIME OF THE RECALL. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THE RECALL REPAIR SHOULD CONSIST OF INSTALLING AN OIL JET KIT. THE RECALL WAS PERFORMED ON AUGUST 12, 2004. THE MILEAGE ON THE VEHICLE AT THIS TIME WAS 64,111. IN AUGUST 2005, THE CONTACT NOTICED THE TRANSMISSION SLIPPING UPON ACCELERATION INTO SECOND GEAR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THERE WAS NOT A PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE'S TRANSMISSION. THE PROBLEM BECAME PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. IN JANUARY 2006, THE DEALERSHIP CONFIRMED THE TRANSMISSION WA SREPLACED AT CONTACT'S EXPENSE. A SAFETY CONCERN EXISTED AS ACKNOWLEDGED BY HONDA WHEN THE RECALL REPAIRS WERE MADE. THE REPAIRS HAVE NOT PREVENTED TRANSMISSION FAILURE. THEREFORE, CREATING A SAFETY HAZARD. *AK
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10146150December 27, 2005
SUSPENSION:FRONT
DT: THE CONTACT HAD RECALL REPAIRS PERFORMED FOR NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN ID 05V385000 CONCERNING THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS. AFTERWARDS, HE NOTICED VIBRATION IN THE FRONT SUSPENSION AND THE VEHICLE PULLED TO THE LEFT. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER THAT PERFORMED THE RECALL REPAIRS. THE DEALER DETERMINED THE VEHICLE WAS OUT OF ALIGNMENT. THE DEALER PERFORMED A FRONT ALIGNMENT AND THIS CORRECTED THE PROBLEM. *AK UPDATED 1/23/2006 - *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10136665September 8, 2005
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS
CONSUMER CONCERNED ABOUT POTENTIAL DESIGN PROBLEM WITH HONDA & ACURA VEHICLES RE TOWING VEHICLE BEHIND A MOTORHOME, 2002 ACURA MDX BROKE LOOSE FM MOTORHOME AT THE UNIBODY FRAME.*MR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10136664September 8, 2005
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS
CONSUMER CONCERNED ABOUT POTENTIAL DESIGN PROBLEM WITH HONDA & ACURA VEHICLES RE TOWING VEHICLE BEHIND A MOTORHOME, 2002 ACURA MDX BROKE LOOSE FM MOTORHOME AT THE UNIBODY FRAME.*MR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10129112July 8, 2005
POWER TRAIN, AIR BAGS, SUSPENSION
2002 MDX TRANSMISSION NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.***NO ANSWER REQUIRED***. *MR THE SWAY BARS CRACKED SIX MONTHS AFTER PURCHASING THE VEHICLE, THE SUPPLEMENTAL RESTRAINT LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND IT TOOK 4 MONTHS TO GET IT FIXED. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10129134July 8, 2005
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS
CONCERN REGARDING TOWING HONDA AUTOMOBILES BEHIND A MOTOR HOME.*MR THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE BROKE AWAY FROM THE MOTOR HOME AT THE UNIBODY FRAME AT 89-9 MPH AND T-BONED A LIGHT STANDARD AND ROLLED INTO THE DESERT. THE VEHICLE HAD A BREAK AWAY SYSTEM ON THE VEHICLE WITH A REGULAR BRAKE SYSTEM THAT OPERATES FROM THE MOTOR HOME BRAKE SYSTEM, BUT NEITHER OF THEM WORKED. *JB
Crash:
Yes
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10126728June 27, 2005
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING OUR 2002 ACURA MDX ABOUT 35-40 MPH WHEN THE CAR LOCKED UP LIKE THE BRAKES WERE SLAMMED ON. CAR WAS IMMOBILE AND COULD NOT BE PUSHED OFF THE ROADWAY UNTIL THE ARRIVAL OF A TOW TRUCK. DEALER NOW HAS THE CAR AND SAYS IT WAS TRANSMISSION FAILURE. SYMTOMS ARE THE SAME AS DISCRIBED AS FAILURES IN A RECALL OF THIS VEHICLE. RECALL WORK WAS DONE ABOUT 5000 MILES AGO IN WHICH AN OILING DEVICE WAS INSTALLED TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. FAILURE OCCURED ANYWAY AFTER THE CORRECTION. MY CONTENTION IS THAT THE REQUIRED INSPECTION OF THE GEARS WAS NOT PERFORMED CORRECTLY AND THE "FIX" WAS PERFORMED INSTEAD. THE DEALER SAYS I MAY BE LIABLE FOR 4500 DOLLARS TO REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE TRANSMISSION BECAUSE IT HAS 101000 MILES ON IT AND THEY ONLY WARRENTY IT TO 100000. IF THE PROBLEM WAS RECOGNIZED AT 96000 WHEN THE RECALL WORK WAS DONE, I WOULDN'T BE IN THIS PREDICAMENT- THANKS
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10120087May 6, 2005
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
DT: AFTER ACCELERATING THE CAR LOCKED UP AND HE SKIDDED 3 OR 4 FEET. HAS A CLICKING NOISE FROM THE TRANSMISSION. NOW THE CAR WON'T SHIFT GEARS OR GO OVER 10 MPH; HAD IT LOOKED AT AND WAS TOLD BY MANUFACTURER THAT IT WAS NOT COVERED IN THE RECALL. DID GET OTHER OPINIONS ON THE TRANSMISSION PROBLEM, AND WAS TOLD THAT THE FIRST PERSON THAT LOOKED AT IT WAS INCORRECT IN THEIR DIAGNOSIS.*AK
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10110491February 14, 2005
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
ON JANUARY 12, 2005 WHILE TRAVELING ON I-5 AT APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH THE TRANSMISSION IN MY 2002 ACURA MDX LOCKED UP. HINSHAW'S ACURA CONCLUDED THE FAILURE CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE HALF SHAFT, VTEC PRESSURE SWITCH, OIL FILTER HOUSING, INTERMEDIATE SHAFT, AND RIGHT OUTSIDE DRIVESHAFT. HINSHAW'S ACURA CONCLUDED ALL OF THESE ITEMS REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TO RESTORE MY MDX TO NORMAL. THEY GAVE ME A REPAIR ESTIMATE OF SEVERAL THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. I INFORMED THEM THAT I HAVE ALWAYS COMPLIED WITH ALL OF THE SCHEDULED ACURA RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE ITEMS ON MY MDX DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND AFTERWARDS. IN FACT, THE MOST RECENT 60K MAINTENANCE WAS PERFORMED AT HINSHAW'S ACURA ON NOVEMBER 22, 2004. I ALSO INFORMED THEM THAT MY MAINTENANCE RECORDS WERE AVAILABLE FOR THEIR REVIEW FROM BOTH ACURA OF SEATTLE AND BELLEVUE ACURA. FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE BEEN THE SOLE OWNER AND DRIVER OF THIS VEHICLE SINCE IT WAS NEW. IT HAS NEVER BEEN OFF ROAD, ABUSED, OR BEEN INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT. THE LOCAL ACURA REPRESENTATIVE REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE FAILURE OR CONSIDER REIMBURSEMENT FOR ANY DAMAGES. AFTER I FILED A COMPLAINT WITH ACURA CUSTOMER RELATIONS, THEY AGREED TO ONLY PAY HALF OF THE REPAIR COSTS. THE INJUSTICE IN THIS WHOLE EXPERIENCE STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS RECALLED BY ACURA (NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 04V176000) FOR EXACTLY THE SAME PROBLEM THAT CAUSED THE DAMAGES AND ENDANGERED MY LIFE AND THAT OF OTHER DRIVERS NEAR ME. I HAVE RIGOROUSLY FOLLOWED THE RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE AS DEFINED IN MY ACURA OWNERSHIP MANUAL. IF THIS PROBLEM WOULD HAVE BEEN PROPERLY RESOLVED AT THE TIME I RETURNED MY MDX TO THE DEALER DURING THE RECALL, THIS MALFUNCTION WOULD HAVE NEVER OCCURRED.*AK
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10108916January 26, 2005
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL
WHILE THE CONSUMER WAS DRIVING AT 30 MPH SUDEENLY THE VEHICLE TURNED LEFT ON ITS OWN, THEN TURNED RIGHT ON ITS OWN, AND ACCELERATED.*AK
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0

← Back to Acura MDX