Nissan Quest Complaints

2,121 consumer complaints on file.

#10176856December 22, 2006
STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
THE AUTOMATIC SIDE DOORS CLOSE WITH AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF FORCE AND AN INADEQUATE SAFETY MECHANISM. AS A GROWN ADULT THEY CAN PUSH ME OVER BEFORE THE ACTUALLY REVERSE DIRECTIONS. TODAY, MY 18 MONTH OLD SON GOT HIS THUMB CAUGHT IN THE DOOR AND IT DID NOT RELEASE. HE THUMB WAS SERIOUSLY INJURED, BUT FORTUNATELY WE THINK IT IS NOT BROKEN. I WAS JUST SHOCKED THAT A VEHICLE DESIGNED FOR FAMILY TOOK SO LITTLE CONSIDERATION WITH REGARDS TO THE OPERATION OF THE DOORS. THANK, MIKE. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
1
Deaths:
0
#10176223December 15, 2006
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY, VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE ENGINE STALLED WITHOUT WARNING. AFTERWARDS, THE ENGINE WOULD NOT RESTART, AND THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER. INITIALLY, THE DEALER DETERMINED THE BATTERY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED, BUT THE PROBLEM PERSISTED. THE DEALER LATER DETERMINED THE THROTTLE BODY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AFTER THE REPLACEMENT, THE STALLING CONTINUED, AND THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER TO AWAIT INSTALLATION OF A DATA RECORDER TO RECORD ANY TYPE OF FAILURE WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS ALERTED.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10175646December 9, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
ON THREE INCIDENTS, THE ENGINE WILL REV HOWEVER THE VEHICLE FAILED TO ACCELERATE AS THOUGH IT WAS IN THE WRONG GEAR. IF THE ENGINE IS RESTARTED THEN THE PROBLEM CLEARS ITSELF HOWEVER THAT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE WHEN DRIVING ON A HIGHWAY. TOOK THE VAN TO THE DEALER WITH SEVERAL COPIES OF COMPLAINTS FILED BY OTHERS, HOWEVER THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO REPLICATE THE PROBLEM THEREFORE NOTHING WAS DONE. NISSAN SHOULD SERIOUSLY LOOK INTO THIS PROBLEM AND NOT ADDRESS THE PROBLEM BECAUSE THEY CANNOT REPLICATE THE PROBLEM. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10175647December 9, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR
FRONT BRAKE ROTORS REPLACED AT 4000 MILES DUE TO STEERING WHEEL SHIMMY WHEN BRAKE IS APPLIED. PROBLEM RESURFACED AT 11000MILES. BROUGHT TO DEALER FOR THE SAME COMPLAINT AT 15000 MILES. THEY FOUND ROTORS RUNOUT FOR BOTH THE FRONT AND REAR TO BE EXCESSIVE. RESURFACED FOUR ROTORS AND CHANGED BRAKE PADS. DEALER DID NOT COVER UNDER WARRANTY CITING THAT IT WAS A WEAR ITEM. IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THE PARTS ARE NOT UP TO SPECIFICATION ESPECIALLY WITH THE FAILURE AT 4000 MILES. NISSAN NEEDS TO ADDRESS THAT PROBLEM. TWO OCCURANCES WITHIN 10000 MILES IS NOT THE NORM. THE ROTOR THICKNESS FOR THE SUBSEQUENT MODEL IS THICKER THAN ONE USED ON THE 04 MODEL. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10175633December 8, 2006
TIRES
I HAVE 2004 NISSAN QUEST, IT CAME WITH GOODYEAR EAGLE LS2, THE SIZE 225/6516. THERE IS ONLY ONE COMPANY WHICH MAKES THAT TIRE, GOODYEAR. I ROTATED TIRE AS SUGGESTED. THE TIRE TRACTION IS LOWEST ONE CAN GET. AFTER DRIVING 20,000 MILES ON THE TIRE STARTED SHOWING SEVERE WEAR. BUBBLE SHOWING ON THE OUTSIDE WALL. WROTE TO NISSAN 3 TIMES, THEY NEVER BOTHERED ME CONTACT ME BACK, CALLED ONCE AND TOLD ABOUT THE TIRE PROBLEM, THE ANSWER WAS WE CANNOT DO ANYTHING YOU HAVE TO PUT SAME TIME I.E. GOODYEAR 225/6516. AND GOOD YEAR KNOWING THAT THEY ONLY MANUFACTURE THAT SIZE PRICED THAT TIRE IS $150+ EACH, BUT ACTUALLY IT IS WORTH $39.99. THE PROBLEM IS IT IS JUST THE MONOPOLY BETWEEN NISSAN AND GOODYEAR, THEY COULD HAVE CHOSEN DIFFERENT SIZE, WHICH WILL GIVE CONSUMER MORE CHOICE. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10175198December 5, 2006
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:SENSOR/CONTROL MODULE, FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: INSTRUMENT CLUSTER/PANEL
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE TRAVELING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE AIRBAG WARNING LIGHT REMAINED ILLUMINATED AFTER AN OCCUPANT WHO WEIGHED 115 POUNDS SAT IN THE SEAT. THE FRONT PASSENGER AIR BAG WOULD NOT DEPLOY IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH WHEN THE AIR BAG LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. ON ANOTHER OCCASION, AN OCCUPANT WHO WEIGHED 150 POUNDS SAT IN THE PASSENGER SEAT, AND THE AIR BAG LIGHT REMAINED ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHO PERFORMED A DIAGNOSTIC, AND DID NOT PROVIDE ANY ERROR CODES. THE DEALER AND CONTACT ENCOUNTERED A NHTSA RECALL #04V103000, REGARDING THE AIR BAGS: FRONTAL: SENSOR/CONTROL MODULE. THE DEALER DETERMINED THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. ALSO, THE FUEL GAUGE ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL, DID NOT DISPLAY THE CORRECT AMOUNT OF FUEL IN THE FUEL TANK. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHO REPLACED THE FUEL TANK, FUEL PUMP, BUT THE PROBLEM RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT CONTACTED.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10175210December 5, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:PADS, SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH AND WHEN DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL, A SCRAPING NOISE WAS HEARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE SERVICE DEALER, WHO REPLACED THE FRONT AND REAR BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS. THE MANUFACTURER EXPRESSED THAT THE BRAKES WERE TOO SMALL FOR THE VEHICLE. UPDATED 2/12/2007 - THE CONSUMER HAD AN 1993 QUEST FOR 11 YEARS. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE 2004'S BRAKES ARE SOFTER THAN THE 1993 MODEL. THE 2004'S BRAKES ARE THE SAME SIZE AS THE 1993 QUEST EVENTHOUGH THE WEIGHT HAS INCREASED BY ALMOST 1000 LBS. THE 2007'S BRAKE SIZE HAS BEEN INCREASED. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10174230November 25, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR
I AM VERY UNHAPPY WITH THE 2004 NISSAN QUEST. I HAVE HAD TO BRING IT TO THE DEALERSHIP ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS SINCE I BOUGHT IT WITH 12 MILES IN SEPTEMBER 2004. I THOUGHT THAT THE NISSAN NAME WOULD BE AS GOOD AS THE TOYOTAS THAT I HAVE BOUGHT, WHICH HAVE LASTED WITHOUT TRIPS TO THE DEALER EVERY FEW THOUSAND MILES. THIS COMPLAINT IS BASED ON HAVING TO REPLACE THE BRAKES AND ROTOR AT 29,000 MILES; IT WAS JUST THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S BACK. ONCE I LOOKED INTO THE COMPLAINTS LISTED, I REALIZED THAT THIS COULD BE A DESIGN FLAW. WHEN I INQUIRED OF THE SERVICE MANAGER ABOUT THE BRAKES WEARING SO QUICKLY, HE STATED IT IS A HEAVY VEHICLE AND IT ALL DEPENDS ON HOW YOU DRIVE. HE STATED THAT SOME PEOPLE'S BRAKES ON THIS SAME MAKE AND MODEL WEAR OUT EVEN SOONER, AS IF THIS WAS SOME CONSOLATION TO ME. WELL, I HAVE BEEN DRIVING FOR 19 YEARS, AND I HAVE NEVER HAD A BRAND NEW VEHICLE NOT ONLY WEAR THROUGH BRAKE PADS SO QUICKLY, BUT RIGHT TO THE ROTORS WITHOUT WARNING!! THAT'S WHAT INFURIATES ME THE MOST; ONCE I HEAR A SIGN THAT THE BRAKE PADS ARE THINNING, I GET THE BRAKES REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE I AM AWARE THAT IF THEY ARE WORN TO THE ROTORS, THEN THE REPAIR COSTS THREE TIMES AS MUCH. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10174163November 24, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP:ABS WARNING LIGHT, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: INSTRUMENT CLUSTER/PANEL
VEHICLE ABS LIGHTS, SLIP LIGHT AND VSD LIGHT ACTIVATED AND VEHICLE LOST BRAKING SYSTEM TO MANUAL FROM POWER. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10173012November 9, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
MY 2004 NISSAN QUEST SE WITH 20,000 MILES FAILED TO MOVE WHEN IN (D) GEAR AND ACCELERATOR APPLIED. WHILE IN A TRAFFIC JAM, THE ENGINE REVVED BUT VEHICLE EXPERIENCED NO FORWARD MOTION AS IF IN NEUTRAL. ABOUT 5 SECONDS LATER THE VEHICLE LURCHED FORWARD, AND WE ALMOST HIT THE VEHICLE AHEAD OF US. MINUTES IN THE SAME TRAFFIC JAM, THE VEHICLE WENT INTO THIS "NEUTRAL" MODE AGAIN. I PUT IT IN PARK AND BACK INTO DRIVE, TO AVOID AN ACCIDENT, AND THE VEHICLE MOVED SLUGGISHLY FORWARD, THEN PROCEEDED NORMALLY. THIS HAPPENED ONCE MORE THAT DAY. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10172303October 31, 2006
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM/PCM/TECM)
A LOUD TICKING SOUND WHEN STARTING UP COLD FOR ABOUT 5 MINUTES BEFORE IT WARMS UP. WE REPORTED THIS A FEW MONTHS AGO AND WERE TOLD THAT IT WAS THE VARIABLE TIMING CHAIN, THEN WERE TOLD NO IT'S NORMAL, THEN IT'S THE VTC, NO THE ENGINEER SAYS IT'S NORMAL. THEY ARE REFUSING TO REPAIR. IT IS NOT A NORMAL SOUND. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10172114October 30, 2006
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:EXHAUST SYSTEM:EMISSION CONTROL:CATALYTIC CONVERTOR
I PURCHASED A CERTIFIED PRE-OWED NISSAN QUEST 2004 10/25/06 FROM PORTER NISSAN 600 OGLETOWN ROAD,NEWARK DE. ON 10/26/06 I DROVE THE CAR TO NEW YORK TO SEE MY DAUGHTER AND I BECAME VERY SICK. I HAD HEADACHE, NAUSEA AND FELT ILL WHILE I DROVE THE CAR. I GOT IN THE CAR RETURN BACK TO DELAWARE, THE MORE I DROVE THE CAR THE SICKER I BECAME, HEADACHE ,NAUSEA,DIZZINESS, I HAD TO PULL OVER 3 TIMES PRIOR TO ARRIVING TO DE. I REALIZED THAT THE CAR WAS MAKING ME ILL AND CONTINUE MY JOURNEY TO RETURN THE CAR TO THE DEALER 10/27/06 APPROX 9-10 AM. I ALSO INFORMED THE DEALER THAT THE REAR FLOOR RUGS CONTINUE TO BE WET! THEN I PROCEEDED TO EMERGENCY ROOM FOR TREATMENT. LATER PORTER NISSAN FOUND A CRACK IN EXHAUST SYSTEM AND THE FUMES MADE ME SICK. I COULD HAVE DIED OR HURT SOME ON THE ROAD. I BELIEVE THAT BUYING A CERTIFIED CAR SHOULD PREVENT A CONSUMER FROM BUY A LEMON. I AFRAID TO DRIVE THE CAR AGAIN, MY HEADACHE COME AND GOES. JUST THE THOUGHT OF GETTING THAT CAR MAKE FEEL ILL. PORTER NISSAN IS TRYING TO MAKE ME TAKE THAT CAR BACK. AND I TRULY DON'T FEEL SAFE IN THE CAR. HOW EVER I DO WANT ANOTHER NISSAN QUEST BECAUSE I AM MINI-VAN DRIVER AND IT IS THE CAR THAT I WANTED. BUT I DON'T WANT TO DIE TRYING TO FIND OUT IF THE CAR IS SAFE. I DRIVE 1 HOUR TO WORK AND I AM LONG DISTANCE DRIVER , I SPEND MORE HOURS IN MY CAR THAN I DO AT HOME. A CERTIFIED PRE-OWED IS SUPPOSE TO BE SAFE!!!!!!!!! HELP ME PLEASE I HAVE A APPOINT WITH PORTER NISSAN APPROX 5-6PM 10/30/06 TRY TO CONTACT ME. HIGHLY CONCERN
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10172204October 30, 2006
TIRES:TREAD/BELT
TIRE TREAD WEAR. THE OEM TIRES (GOODYEAR EAGLE LS2 225/65 HR16) TREADS WEAR DOWN AROUND 25K MILES. THERE IS ONLY ONE MANUFACTURER OF THESE TIRES AND THERE IS NO WARRANTY ON THEM. ATTEMPTING TO FIND REPLACEMENT TIRES AT A REASONABLE COST IS NOT EASY. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10171705October 24, 2006
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH THROUGH AN INTERSECTION, THE ENGINE STALLED WITHOUT WARNING, AND WOULD NOT RESTART. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER WHO DETERMINED THE CYLINDER HEAD NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AFTER THE REPLACEMENT, UPON ATTEMPTING TO START THE ENGINE, IT WOULD NOT START. THE CONTACT CHARGED THE BATTERY, AND DROVE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER WHO DETERMINED THERE WAS A LOOSE BATTERY CABLE. AFTERWARDS, THERE WAS A RUBBING NOISE COMING FROM UNDERNEATH THE VEHICLE FOLLOWED BY AN ELECTRICAL ODOR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER TO AWAIT FURTHER INSPECTION. THE MANUFACTURER WAS ALERTED. THE SECOND TIME THE INCIDENT HAPPENED, THE CONSUMER WAS TOLD A BAG HAD ATTACHED ITSELF TO THE MOTOR, BUT OFFERED NO REASON AS TO WHY THE VEHICLE WAS SHUTTING OFF. EVERY TIME THE VEHICLE SHUTS OFF, THERE IS AN ELECTRICAL SMELL. UPDATED 12/1/06. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10171250October 18, 2006
TIRES, TIRES:SIDEWALL
ON 10/21/06, MY WIFE WAS DRIVING HER NISSAN QUEST ON THE FREEWAY WHEN SHE SUDDENLY HEARD THE FRONT RIGHT SIDE TIRE BLOWOUT. THE TIRE WAS TAKEN TO THE GOODYEAR DEALERSHIP WHERE IT WAS BOUGHT, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE TIRE DID NOT RECEIVE A PUNCTURE THAT WOULD CAUSE THE TIRE TO BLOWOUT. THE TIRE WAS SHREDDED ON THE OUTSIDE TIRE WALL, AND IT LOOKS AS IF IT WERE CUT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE TIRE WAS NOT CUT BY ANY SHARP OBJECT, MY WIFE CAN ATTEST TO THIS FACT BECAUSE SHE DID NOT SEE OR NOTICE ANY DAMAGE TO THE TIRE BEFORE SHE GOT INTO THE CAR A DROVE AWAY. THE ONLY THING THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE TIRE WAS REPLACED WITH A SAME SIZE USED TIRE UNTIL THIS MATTER IS RESOLVED. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10171111October 17, 2006
SEATS:MID/REAR ASSEMBLY
THE 2005 NISSAN QUEST HAD A RECALL THAT PREVENTED INJURY WHEN FOLDING DOWN THE MIDDLE SEATS. THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBERS WERE 05V474000 AND 05V480000. AFTER HAVING THIS RECALL PERFORMED ON MY VEHICLE, IT IS NOW ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO ATTACH A CHILD RESTRAINT TETHER TO THE TETHER ANCHOR POINT. I BELIEVE THAT THE FIX FOR THIS RECALL HAS CAUSED AN EVEN MORE SERIOUS SAFETY PROBLEM THAN THE ONE IT ATTEMPTED TO FIX. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10170587October 11, 2006
SEATS:MID/REAR ASSEMBLY
I OWN A 2005 NISSAN QUEST MINIVAN. THE 2 SEATS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE VAN HAVE CURTAINS ON THE ALL AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE SEAT. THESE ARE CONSTANTLY COMING UNDONE AND SPREAD OUT ON THE FLOORBOARD OF THE VAN. THEY ARE A TRIPPING HAZARD AND MY DAUGHTER HAS TRIPPED OVER THEM AND FALLEN OUT OF THE VAN AND LANDED ON CONCRETE. ACCORDING TO THE DEALER, THE ONLY RECALL IS ON THE SEATS IN THE REAR WHICH THEY HAVE REPAIRED. I WAS INFORMED TO CONTACT NISSAN DIRECTLY AND THEY JUST REFERRED ME BACK TO A DEALER (THE RUN-AROUND!!)THESE CURTAINS DO NOT STAY PUT AND SOMEONE NEEDS TO FIX THEM PERMANENTLY BEFORE SOME CHILD IS SERIOUSLY HURT. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
2
Deaths:
0
#10170328October 10, 2006
TIRES:TREAD/BELT
THE OEM TIRES INSTALLED IN MY 05 NISSAN QUEST S WHEN NEW ARE IN NEED OF BEING REPLACED AT ONLY 30000 MILLES. THE TIRE IN QUESTION IS THE GOODYEAR EAGLE LS2. I'VE BEEN READING REVIEWS OF OWNER OF THIS KIND OF VEHICLE. WE ARE MOSTLY COMPLAINING OF THE LACK OF TREAD WARRANTY IN THIS TIRES, ALSO ABOUT HOW FAST THESE TIRES' LIFES ARE GONE SO FAST AND FINALLY THAT THIS IS THE ONLY TIRE IN THIS SIZE AVAILABLE. IN OTHER WORDS WE NEED TO KEEP UP PURCHASING A REALLY BAD TIRE AT A HIGH PRICE. CAN YOU HELP US, THE CONSUMERS. *NM
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10169798October 2, 2006
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
BRAKING ON ANY DOWNHILL INCLINE CAUSES THE VEHICLE TO VIBRATE SEVERELY AND THE STEERING WHEEL TO SHAKE. COULD CAUSE LOSS OF CONTROL. *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10169553September 28, 2006
TIRES
10/04 PURCHASED A NISSAN QUEST SL MINIVAN. TIRES ON IT ARE GOODYEAR EAGLE LS2 SIZE 225/65-HR16. LATE 12/04 OR EARLY 1/05 NOT ABLE TO NAVIGATE A 15 DEGREE GRADE IN 3 INCHES SNOW. CONTACTED DEALER TO NO AVAIL. CONTACTED NISSAN. TOLD TO CONTACT GOODYEAR. GOODYEAR SAID THEY WOULD REPLACE THE TIRES WITH A BETTER TIRE, BUT IN A DIFFERENT SIZE, AS ONLY TIRE MADE IN THE ORIGINAL SIZE WAS AND IS A GOODYEAR EAGLE LS2. THIS ACTION HOWEVER HAD TO HAVE BLESSING OF NISSAN. NISSAN BALKED STATING IF I CHANGED TIRE SIZE AND ANYTHING HAPPENED THAT THEY DETERMINED WAS CAUSED BY TIRE SIZE CHANGE, THE "WARRANTY" WOULD BE VOID ON THE VEHICLE. I WAS NAIVE AND BOUGHT THIS. BUT ALL THE WHILE, THE DEALER, NISSAN AND GOODYEAR SAID THEY HAD NO SUCH PROBLEMS WITH THIS TIRE. NOW TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD I FIND HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS REGARDS THIS ISSUE AND MORE, ONE OF WHICH THE TIRES WEAR OUT PREMATURELY, AND AND "H" RATED TIRE ON A MINIVAN IS REDUNDANT. FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENED MY WIFE WAS IN HEAVY TRAFFIC. SHE COULD HAVE BEEN INJURED OR KILLED. YET NISSAN AND/OR GOODYEAR ARE NOT BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR AN ENGINEERING/DESIGN FLAW, THAT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED. GOODYEAR SHOULD HAVE TO MANUFACTURER OTHER TIRES IN THIS SIZE AND IN AN "H" RATING SO BUYERS/OWNERS PRESENT AND PAST HAVE A CHOICE WHEN REPLACING. WE CAN GO TO A 235/60-16 IN A "T" RATED TIRE THAT HAS MUCH BETTER RATINGS THAN THE ORIGINALS AND/OR OTHER "H" RATED TIRES IN THE NEW SIZE. BUT DEALERS AND TIRE MANUFACTURERS THROUGH COLLUSION ARE TRYING TO DISCOURAGE REPLACING THESE WITH "T" RATED TIRES. INSTEAD INSISTING THEY BE REPLACED WITH "H" RATED TIRES, THAT ARE MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE, AND HAVE ONLY SIMILAR TRACTION RATINGS WITH REGARD TO HYDROPLANING, WET, LIGHT AND HEAVY SNOW THAT DO THE ORIGINALS. THE NHTSA SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN ON THIS LIKE STINK ON CRAP, BUT I FAIL TO SEE ANY MENTION OF ANY SUCH INVESTIGATION ON YOUR WEB SITE. COME ON, DOESN'T OUR TAX DOLLARS PAY FOR THIS? *JB
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0

← Back to Nissan Quest