Chrysler Pacifica Complaints (2004)

896 consumer complaints on file.

#10583683April 19, 2014
SUSPENSION
SUB FRAME (K FRAME) RUST. BROUGHT CAR TO DEALER WHERE PURCHASED AND MAINTAINED FOR REGULAR SCHEDULED SERVICE. WE WERE ADVISE BY SERVICE PERSON THAT THE K-MEMBER HAD RUST HOLES AND WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. HE HAD A QUOTE OF $7000 TO REPLACE WITH NEW SUB FRAME. I FOUND A SERVICE BULLETIN AND BROUGHT IT TO THE DEALER, I WAS ADVISED THAT MY VIN WAS NOT PART OF THE RECALL. THIS CAR WAS BOUGHT NEW AND HAS HAD ALL SERVICE AT THIS DEALERSHIP. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10582863April 15, 2014
STRUCTURE:BODY
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SUB CRADLE ON THE VEHICLE WAS COVERED WITH AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF RUST. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER OR A LOCAL MECHANIC. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE DEFECT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 85,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 87,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10582962April 15, 2014
ENGINE
I HAVE SUSPICION THAT MY 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA'S MOTOR MOUNTS ARE BELOW EXPECTED STANDARDS. I MONITOR MY VEHICLES FOR COMPLAINTS AND RECALLS TO INSURE THAT IF I HAVE TO HAVE WORK DONE ON MY CARS IT IS FOR EXPECTED WEAR AND TEAR OF ANY VEHICLE. IT IS THROUGH THIS MONITORING THAT I HAVE NOTICED THAT I AM NOT THE ONLY PERSON TO EXPERIENCE WHAT SOUNDS LIKE SUBSTANDARD MOTOR MOUNTS. THIS HAS BEEN MY 1ST VEHICLE OF ANY KIND TO REQUIRE REPLACEMENT MOTOR MOUNTS.MY 2005 PACIFICA WITH 200K MILES HAS HAD TO HAVE BOTH MOTOR MOUNTS REPLACED. IT SEEMS THAT BEFORE THEY WERE REPLACE THEY WERE NO LONGER FUNCTIONING AND THE MOTOR WAS BEING HELD IN PLACE BY 3 OTHER MINOR MOUNTS. APPARENTLY, THE BACKORDER IS SO BAD THAT IT COULD NOT BE GUARANTEED WITHIN 2 MONTHS. I HAD TO ORDER THEM THROUGH A 3RD PARTY IN ORDER TO REPLACE BEFORE ANY MAJOR DAMAGE WAS CAUSED. THIS RAISES RED FLAGS: ARE THESE FAULTY MOUNTS? DO THEY NO LONGER MAKE THESE MOUNTS FOR OTHER VEHICLES? IF SO, IS IT DUE TO SUBSTANDARD DESIGN? WHY HAS THERE NOT BEEN AN INVESTIGATION? THIS IS NOT RIGHT. WHAT CAN I DO? READ MORE: HTTP://WWW.FAQS.ORG/CAR/CHRYSLER-PACIFICA-2005/STRUCTURE/#IXZZ2YZEIS2HS *TT
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10579516April 14, 2014
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH ALL OF THE WARNING LAMPS ILLUMINATED AND THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO STATED THAT THE THROTTLE BODY MODULE WAS DEFECTIVE AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 126,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10579702April 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:HORN
THE HORN FOR THE CAR WILL SOUND INDISCRIMINATELY. IT WILL SOUND AT ANY SPEED, ANY TIME OF DAY, AND EVEN WHEN THE VEHICLE ISN'T RUNNING OR HAS A KEY IN THE IGNITION. WHEN THE HORN SOUNDS, OTHER DRIVERS GET DISTRACTED OR CONFUSED BY THE SOUND. DRIVING WITH THE HORN ON IS ALSO VERY DISTRACTING. I AM UNCERTAIN IF PULLING THE FUSE FOR THE HORN WILL AFFECT THE AIRBAG OPERATION. *JS
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10579377April 12, 2014
STRUCTURE
A FRAME SUPPORT (CROSS MEMBER) HAS A HOLE BIG ENOUGH TO PUT PART OF YOUR HAND INTO. THIS WHOLE ALSO GOES RIGHT OUT THE BACK SIDE OF THE SUPPORT. THIS SUPPORT NOT ONLY HOLDS UP THE ENGINE BUT ALSO GIVES STABILITY TO THE FRONT END. RISKS ARE LOSS OF LIFE,COMPLETE LOSS OF CONTROL AND OR SEVERE ENGINE DAMAGE SHOULD SUPPORT FAIL. *JS
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10578797April 10, 2014
STRUCTURE, ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
I TOOK MY CAR TO MY MECHANIC FOR REQUIRED ANNUAL STATE SAFETY INSPECTION, WHICH IT FAILED BECAUSE THE ENGINE CRADLE WAS RUSTED THROUGH WITH HOLES, AND THE ENGINE MOUNTING LOOSE. THERE HAD BEEN NO EVIDENCE OF THIS AT HIS PREVIOUS SERVICING OF THE CAR, WHICH IS DONE REGULARLY. I RESEARCHED ONLINE AND FOUND MANY POSTINGS OF OTHER PACIFICA OWNERS WITH THE SAME ISSUES, AND A COPY OF A LETTER FROM CHRYSLER TO SOME ORIGINAL OWNERS REGARDING AN EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR THE REPAIRS. MANY PEOPLE STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT GET CHRYSLER TO COMPLY WITH THEIR REQUESTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT DUE TO THE SPECIFIC MANUFACTURING TIME LIMITATIONS OUTLINED IN THAT WARRANTY (26). I CALLED CHRYSLER AND WAS TOLD BY REPRESENTATIVE [XXX] THAT MY CAR WOULD BE COVERED, EVEN THOUGH MY CAR WAS NOT MANUFACTURED BETWEEN THOSE SPECIFIED DATES, AND TO TAKE MY CAR TO A CHRYSLER DEALER SO THAT I WOULDN'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR REIMBURSEMENT, AND THAT IF THEY HAD A PROBLEM THEY COULD CALL CHRYSLER. I DID SO. THE DEALER CALLED CHRYSLER, AND WAS TOLD THAT CHRYSLER WOULD NOT HONOR THE ORIGINAL DETERMINATION TO COVER MY CAR. I CALLED CHRYSLER A SECOND TIME, AND WAS TOLD BY [XXX] THAT A SUPERVISOR HAD DECIDED THAT [XXX] HAD BEEN WRONG IN TELLING ME THEY WOULD COVER MY CAR'S REPAIRS, AND THAT THIS DECISION WAS FINAL. I WAS NOT PERMITTED TO SPEAK WITH ANY SUPERVISOR, AND [XXX] REFUSED TO GIVE ME HER LAST NAME. SHE ADMITTED THAT MY CASE FILE (NUMBER 24783867) SHOWED THAT I HAD BEEN TOLD MY CAR WOULD BE COVERED, AND THAT THE CALL HAD BEEN RECORDED. I WAS THEN TOLD THAT THE REPAIRS WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE AT MY OWN EXPENSE, FOR WHICH I HAVE BEEN QUOTED AN APPROX. AMOUNT OF $2100.00. CHRYSLER DOES NOT INTEND ANY RECALLS FOR THIS ISSUE. MY CAR IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE, AND WILL NOT PASS STATE SAFETY INSPECTION, UNLESS THE REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE MADE. CHRYSLER SHOULD BE MADE TO MAKE AMENDS FOR THEIR UNSAFE PRODUCT. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10578192April 8, 2014
ENGINE
TL - THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE ENGINE CRADLE WAS COMPLETELY CORRODED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 127,000. RK
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10577843April 7, 2014
SUSPENSION
ENGINE CRADLE IS ROTTTED CAR IS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE HOW DOES DISABLED WIFE GET AROUND SHE HAS CHF HEART FAILURE. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10578110April 7, 2014
STEERING, WHEELS
IN JANUARY, THE SUSPENSION ON OUR 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA (PURCHASED 08/2003), SEEMED TO HAVE ISSUES. A WEB SEARCH TO INVESTIGATE, LED ME TO A MUCH MORE SERIOUS ISSUE THAT EFFECTS '04 AND '05 PACIFICAS. I HAD OUR MECHANIC INSPECT THE FRAME AND SURE ENOUGH, WE WERE ONE OF THE MANY AFFECTED. OUR MECHANIC TOLD US THE CAR WAS NO LONGER SAFE TO DRIVE, AND THAT THE COMPROMISED FRAME CAUSED THE FRONT RIGHT WHEEL TO SHIFT INWARDS. WE WERE QUOTED BETWEEN 4,000 AND 5,000 DOLLARS FOR OUR REPAIRS. THE CAR NOW SITS IN THE GARAGE AS WE HOPE FOR A RESOLUTION. AFTER IN DEPTH RESEARCH, I UNCOVERED THOUSANDS OF COMPLAINTS RELATED TO THE ISSUE, TWO NBC NEWS SEGMENTS, AND A PETITION. I ALSO DISCOVER THAT A FEW YEARS BACK, CHRYSLER EXTENDED THE WARRANTY FOR VEHICLES PRODUCED BETWEEN FEBRUARY AND MARCH OF 2004. HOWEVER, SINCE OUR VEHICLE DID NOT FALL UNDER THIS PROVISION, WE WERE NEVER INFORMED THAT WE MAY HAVE BEEN EFFECTED. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER AND OPENED A CASE. I WAS INSTRUCTED TO WRITE AN EMAIL TO THE CASE MANAGER THAT CONTAINED ALL OF THE INFORMATION WHICH I UNCOVERED ONLINE (AS IF THEY DIDN'T ALREADY KNOW THE ISSUE EXISTED). THIS PROVED TO BE A WASTE OF TIME, AS WE WERE DECLINED ANY ASSISTANCE BECAUSE OUR VEHICLE DID NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXTEND WARRANTY. WE HAVE BEEN THE ONLY OWNERS OF OUR VEHICLE, WHICH HAS 68,000 MILES, HAS BEEN GARAGE KEPT, AND HAS BEEN DRIVEN ONLY BY MY 85 YEAR OLD GRANDPARENTS. APPARENTLY, CHRYSLER HAS MADE A BUSINESS DECISION NOT TO ADDRESS THIS WIDE SPREAD ISSUE. THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF OWNERS DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLES, MANY OF WHICH ARE COMPLETELY UNAWARE THAT THIS ISSUE EXISTS. US, AS WELL AS ALL OTHER PARTIES EFFECTED ARE DUE APPROPRIATE RECOURSE, BUT I FEAR THAT WE WILL HAVE TO CUT TIES WITH OUR VEHICLE BEFORE THERE IS A RESOLUTION. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10577810April 6, 2014
STRUCTURE, ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
ENGINE CRADLE IS RUSTED IN MANY SPOTS CAR IS UNSAFE TO USE. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10577298April 4, 2014
STEERING
OUT OF NO WHERE LAST NIGHT I WENT OVER 45MPH AND MY CAR GAVE OUT ALL CONTROL OF THE STEERING WHEEL. IT WORKS FINE UNLESS I GO OVER 45MPH IT STALLS OUT. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10577423April 4, 2014
STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS, ENGINE, SUSPENSION
I AM ALMOST VERBATIM SUBMITTING AN IDENTICAL COMPLAINT THAT YOU RECEIVED A DAY AFTER I WAS SHOWN THE EXACT SAME PROBLEM, AFTER TAKING MY CHRYSLER PACIFICA IN FOR A ROUTINE OIL CHANGE. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TOLD TOO ON MARCH 28, 2014. I WAS TOLD I HAVE A SUBFRAME/ENGINE CRADLE THAT IS SEVERELY CRACKED AND CORRODED ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE VEHICLE AND SHOWING WEAR ON THE DRIVER SIDE. I WAS NOT INFORMED OF THIS SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE WITH MY VEHICLE. I HAVE SUBMITTED AN EMAIL TO CHRYSLER AND AM WAITING THEIR RESPONSE BUT UNDERSTAND THAT CUSTOMERS ARE MOST OFTEN TOLD THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO TO ASSIST WITH THE NEARLY $3000 COST OF REPLACEMENT, BECAUSE THE VEHICLE WAS NOT MADE IN THE NARROW WINDOW OF PRODUCTION THAT THEY CLAIM WAS AFFECTED AND SUBJECT TO RECALL. AND MAY I ECHO THE ENTIRE LAST COMPLAINT THAT WAS SUBMITTED THAT I JUST READ BECAUSE IT'S EXACTLY HOW I FEEL TOO. I HAVE READ THAT CHRYSLER ALSO SELECTIVELY DECIDES WHO TO HELP WITH THE COST OF REPAIRS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR RECALL WINDOW AND WARRANTY, AFTER THE CUSTOMER MAKES ENOUGH NOISE. IF IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT, WHY ARE THEY DOING THAT? THE NBC REPORT ALSO INDICATES THAT NHTSA SEES NO PATTERN WITH THE NUMEROUS CLAIMS YOU HAVE RECEIVED OUTSIDE OF THE SUPPOSED RECALL WINDOW, LIKE THIS ONE, HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE TO BE PUT AT GRAVE RISK BEFORE YOU SEE A PATTERN? YOU MIGHT SEE A PATTERN IF MORE PEOPLE KNEW THEY ARE DRIVING UNSAFE PACIFICAS, SO THAT THEY COULD REPORT IT. PLEASE RECONSIDER YOUR RECALL DECISION, AS CHRYSLER'S LIABILITY IS CERTAINLY MORE THAN A COUPLE MONTHS OF PRODUCTION. " *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10575885March 31, 2014
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
HAVE A 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA I'VE HAD THIS TRUCK FOR TWO YEARS, I'VE ALWAYS HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE GAS RUNNING OUT LIKE WATER. I TOOK MY TRUCK TO CHRYSLER FOR THEM TO DO A TUNE UP, WHILE THERE I TOLD THEM ABOUT THE PROBLEM. WHEN I GOT BACK TO PICK UPMY TRUCK THEY TOLD ME THAT BOTH OF MY FUEL PUMPS WERE BAD. IT SEEMS LIKE THEY KNOW WHAT'S WRONG WITH THESE TRUCKS AND THEY JUST DECIDED TO TELL EVERYONE THEIR FUEL PUMPS ARE BAD. ANYWAY, I HAD THE FUEL PUMPS CHANGED AND THE PROBLEM GOT WORSE. NOW IF I PUT $10 IN IT THE GAUGE WILL READ 1/2 TANK. IF I FILL IT UP ONCE IT GETS TO 1/2 TANK IT'LL JUST DROP TO THE E. ONCE IT READS E IT CUTS OFF. THERE COULD BE A FULL TANK OF GAS BUT IT WILL STILL READ E. I TOOK IT BACK TO CHRYSLER SO MANY TIMES THEY COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG. THE LAST TIME I WENT BACK UP THERE, THEY SAID I NEED TO REPLACETHE WHOLE TANK. I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT REPLACING THE TANK WON'T FIX IT. TO ADD TO THAT, WHILE I'M PUMPING GAS THE GAS FOAMS OR IT KICKS BACK. I REFUSE TO KEEP PAYING MY MONEY FOR THEM TO KEEP PLAYING THE GUESSING GAME. IF MY TRUCK SHUTS DOWN COMPLETELY OR CAUSE AN ACCIDENT I'M SUING CHRYSLER AND EVERYONE ELSE!!! CHRYSLER NEEDS TO FIX THE ISSUE, THERE IS A DEFECT. I EVEN CALLED HEADQUARTERS AND THEY'RE SAYING THEY CAN'T HELP BECAUSE THE TRUCK IS SO MANY YEARS OLD, AND BECAUSE OF THE MILEAGE. THING IS THEY KNEW WHAT WAS WRONG WITH THESE TRUCKS. CHRYSLER NEEDS TO FIX THIS ISSUE! !!!!! *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10575529March 29, 2014
ENGINE, SUSPENSION
ON MARCH 29, 2014, MY 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA, PURCHASED IN AUGUST 2003, WAS INSPECTED AND DIAGNOSED, BY THE DEALERSHIP WHERE IT WAS PURCHASED, TO HAVE A SUBFRAME/ENGINE CRADLE THAT IS "ROTTING" OR IN OTHER WORDS, SEVERELY CRACKED AND CORRODED. I WAS NOT INFORMED OF THIS SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE WITH MY VEHICLE BY CHRYSLER. I WAS INFORMED BY A RECENT INVESTIGATIVE STORY ON THE LOCAL CHICAGO NBC STATION, FOLLOWED BY INTERNET RESEARCH OF THE ISSUE. I CALLED THE CUSTOMER SERVICE NUMBER GIVEN TO ME FOR CHRYSLER AND WAS TOLD THAT THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO TO ASSIST WITH THE $2600 COST OF REPLACEMENT, BECAUSE THE VEHICLE WAS NOT MADE IN THE NARROW WINDOW OF PRODUCTION THAT THEY CLAIM WAS AFFECTED AND SUBJECT TO RECALL. CHRYSLER TOLD ME THE WARRANTY THEY OFFERED, RELATED TO THE RECALL, WAS EXPIRED FOR MY VEHICLE ANYWAY. I NEVER RECEIVED ANY NOTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM OR THAT WARRANTY, BECAUSE THEY WERE KEEPING THIS PROBLEM A SECRET TO MOST OF THEIR AFFECTED CUSTOMERS. I HAVE READ THAT CHRYSLER ALSO APPARENTLY SELECTIVELY DECIDES WHO TO HELP WITH THE COST OF REPAIRS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR RECALL WINDOW AND WARRANTY, AFTER THE CUSTOMER MAKES ENOUGH NOISE. IF IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT, WHY ARE THEY DOING THAT? ISN'T THIS THE SAME TYPE OF BEHAVIOR THAT TOYOTA AND CHEVROLET HAVE EXHIBITED? THE NBC REPORT ALSO INDICATES THAT NHTSA SEES NO PATTERN WITH THE NUMEROUS CLAIMS YOU HAVE RECEIVED OUTSIDE OF THE SUPPOSED RECALL WINDOW, LIKE THIS ONE, HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE TO BE PUT AT GRAVE RISK BEFORE YOU SEE A PATTERN? YOU MIGHT SEE A PATTERN IF MORE PEOPLE KNEW THEY ARE DRIVING UNSAFE PACIFICAS, SO THAT THEY COULD REPORT IT. SORRY IF I AM BEING A BIT POINTED HERE, BUT THE I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW CHRYSLER AND NHTSA CAN IGNORE THIS ISSUE. PLEASE RECONSIDER YOUR RECALL DECISION, AS CHRYSLER'S LIABILITY IS CERTAINLY MORE THAN A COUPLE MONTHS OF PRODUCTION. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10575366March 28, 2014
SUSPENSION, ENGINE, STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
DISCOVERED ENGINE SUPPORT HAS A RUST THROUGH HOLE APPROX. 1 3/4 X 3/4. ALSO SHOWING OTHER AREAS OF RUST DAMAGE. THIS AUTO IS LOW MILEAGE & GARAGE KEPT. HAVE PHOTOS WITH TAPE MEASURE IF DESIRED. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10575400March 28, 2014
WHEELS
TL* THE CONTACT WAS 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE TIRES WERE CONTINUOUSLY LOSING AIR. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT AFTER INSPECTING THE TIRES, SHE NOTICED THAT ALL FOUR VALVE STEMS CRACKED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THE TECHNICIAN VERIFIED THE FAILURE AND REPLACED ALL FOUR VALVE STEMS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPLACED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 102,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 114,000.
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10574977March 26, 2014
ENGINE
I HAVE HAD THIS CAR FOR SIX YEARS BOUGHT IT USED. I HAVE HAD THE FRONT MOTOR MOUNTS REPLACED FOUR DIFFERENT TIMES. IF I TURN SHARP THEY BREAK. THE FIRST TWO TIMES THE WARRANTY COVERED THEM. I THINK THIS IS A RECALL ISSUE AND CHRYSLER SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR REPAIR CHARGES. I JUST PRAY NO ONE GETS KILLED BEFORE THEY INVESTIGATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS JUST LIKE TOYOTA. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10575010March 26, 2014
ENGINE
DURING AN INSPECTION MY MECHANIC INFORMED ME THAT THE ENGINE CRADLE IS RUSTED THRU. THE CRADLE IS SO RUSTED THAT HE IS AFRAID THAT THE ENGINE WILL FALL OUT OF THE CAR. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A CHRYSLER GUY BUT THIS IS BAD! *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0
#10574215March 22, 2014
STEERING
WAS DRIVING DOWN HIGHWAY AT 55MPH, WITH MY NIECE IN THE CAR WITH ME WHEN THE CAR STARTED TO PULL TO DRIVERS SIDE THE PULLED TO PASSENGER SIDE. I SLOWED THE VEHICLE DOWN TO UNDER 40 IT WAS STILL TRYING SWERVE AND PULL. SCARED ME AND MY NIECE. HAS BEEN CLUNKING SINCE ABOUT SIX MONTHS AFTER I BOUGHT THE VEHICLE IN 2008.. SPENT OVER A GRAND ON NEW TIE RODS, SUSPENSIONS, WHEN I TOOK IT TO DIFFERENT DEALER FOR CHRYSLER VEHICLES WHERE A TECHNICIAN TOLD ME TO STOP WASTING MY MONEY, THEY KNOW THERE IS CLUNK AND DONT KNOW HOW TO FIX IT. I EMAILED AND LEFT MESSAGE FOR CHRYSLER WITH NO RESPINSE. LOOKS LIKE THEY KNOW HOW TO FIX IT BUT CHRYSLER WONT STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT AND FIX THE PROBLEM TILL SOMEONE DIES AND THE FAMILIES OF THE DECEASED HAVE TO SUE THE COMPANY, SERIOUSLY! STAND BEHIND YOUR PRODUCT, I DONT THINK I WILL EVER PURCHASE A CHRYSLER VEHICLE AGAIN AND WILL INFORM ALL FRIENDS AND FAMILY TODO THE SAME. *TR
Crash:
No
Fire:
No
Injuries:
0
Deaths:
0

← Back to Chrysler Pacifica